[PATCH] D69760: [Clang][Driver] Don't pun -fuse-ld=lld as -fuse-ld=lld-link with msvc
    John Ericson via Phabricator via llvm-commits 
    llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
       
    Fri Nov  8 10:08:14 PST 2019
    
    
  
Ericson2314 added a comment.
While I am fine making `-fuse-ld=lld` mean "use that lld driver most appropriate for the clang driver", in principle the clang driver and lld driver choices are orthogonal, and I'd want to expose that with something like `-fuse-ld=ld.lld` to compliment `-fuse-ld=lld-link`. How does that sound? Should we support `-fuse-ld=ld.bfd` and `-fuse-ld=ld64.lld` too?
Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D69760/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69760
    
    
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list