[PATCH] D69916: [WC] Fix a subtle bug in our definition of widenable branch

[Philip Reames via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

reames added a comment.

In D69916#1736148 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69916#1736148>, @apilipenko wrote:

> LGTM. Maybe add a test when the WC has one use but the branch condition is used in multiple branches.


Er, beyond the wc-widen-block example?


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D69916/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D69916