[PATCH] D69563: [LV] Strip wrap flags from vectorized reductions
Denis Antrushin via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Nov 5 01:54:44 PST 2019
dantrushin marked an inline comment as done.
dantrushin added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:3706-3709
+ if (StripWrapFlags) {
+ cast<Instruction>(Val)->setHasNoUnsignedWrap(false);
+ cast<Instruction>(Val)->setHasNoSignedWrap(false);
+ }
----------------
lebedev.ri wrote:
> dantrushin wrote:
> > lebedev.ri wrote:
> > > ```
> > > if(auto* I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(LoopVal))
> > > I->dropPoisonGeneratingFlags();
> > > ```
> > > Shouldn't this be done outside of this loop though?
> > No, I think I want them cleared from every interleaved part
> >
> 1. Still,
> ```
> if(StripWrapFlags)
> cast<Instruction>(Val)->dropPoisonGeneratingFlags();
> ```
> 2. Isn't the actual bug is in `getOrCreateVectorValue()`? why it returns such errneous instructions?
1. But these flags are valid for Val -- it is (original) scalar instruction, which still present in original scalar loop, which serves as
reminder loop after vectorization. I want to preserve flags whereever they are valid, otherwise I just would not preserve them in
InnerLoopVectorizer::widenInstruction:
```
4202 Value *V = Builder.CreateNAryOp(I.getOpcode(), Ops);
4203
4204 if (auto *VecOp = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V))
4205 VecOp->copyIRFlags(&I);
```
2. `getOrCreateVectorValue()` simply returns cached vector value from `VectorLoopValueMap`.
And this instruction was created by `InnerLoopVectorized::widenInstruction()`, which lacks necessary context.
So we basically back to the original question - if we do not want to preserve valid flags at all, we can simply not copy them in
`widenInstruction()` (VectorOp->copyIRFlags(&I, **false**) ).
But if we do want to preserve flags where they're valid, we need a context and clear them only for reductions.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69563/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69563
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list