[PATCH] D69336: [BitVector] Define BitWord as uintptr_t

[Chris Lattner via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

lattner accepted this revision.
lattner added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

This looks like progress to me.  I personally would go with size_t even despite the (theoretical IMO) concern about size_t being a different size, but either way works for me, and both are better than ulong.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D69336/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D69336