[PATCH] D68570: Unify the two CRC implementations

Michał Górny via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Oct 7 11:15:36 PDT 2019

Previous message: [PATCH] D68570: Unify the two CRC implementations
Next message: [PATCH] D68570: Unify the two CRC implementations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

mgorny added a comment.

I'd personally prefer either the non-table approach or having the tables generated at build time. Given this is only going to be used rarely, I don't think we should clutter the code with big tables.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D68570/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D68570

Previous message: [PATCH] D68570: Unify the two CRC implementations
Next message: [PATCH] D68570: Unify the two CRC implementations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list