[PATCH] D67777: Improve comments terseness in PassBuilder.h
Alina Sbirlea via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Sep 20 10:06:47 PDT 2019
asbirlea added a comment.
Thanks for the cleanup! A couple of small comments inline.
================
Comment at: include/llvm/Passes/PassBuilder.h:73
/// Constructor sets pipeline tuning defaults based on cl::opts. Each option
/// can be set in the PassBuilder when using a LLVM as a library.
PipelineTuningOptions();
----------------
s/a LLVM/LLVM
================
Comment at: include/llvm/Passes/PassBuilder.h:76
- /// Tuning option to set loop interleaving on/off. Its default value is that
+ /// Enables/disables loop interleaving. Its default value is that
/// of the flag: `-interleave-loops`.
----------------
clang-format all updated comments back to 80.
================
Comment at: include/llvm/Passes/PassBuilder.h:100
+ /// Disables promotion to scalars in LICM with MemorySSA, if
/// the number of access is too large.
unsigned LicmMssaNoAccForPromotionCap;
----------------
s/access/accesses (might as well correct my typos while at it :) )
================
Comment at: include/llvm/Passes/PassBuilder.h:130
- /// ThinLTO phase.
- ///
----------------
Nit: Maybe keep this line and the empty line below, since it's the comment pattern for all the other structs/enums/classes in this class? It's fine either way.
Repository:
rL LLVM
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D67777/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D67777
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list