[PATCH] D66944: [PowerPC][XCOFF] Verify symbol table in xcoff object files. [NFC]

[Sean Fertile via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

sfertile marked an inline comment as done and an inline comment as not done.
sfertile added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/aix-xcoff-common.ll:69
+; SYMS-NEXT:   Symbol {
+; SYMS-NEXT:     Index: 0
+; SYMS-NEXT:     Name: a
----------------
sfertile wrote:
> jasonliu wrote:
> > These Index could easily change when we add more functionality into XCOFF object writer. Do we care about making the test case more robust? 
> What do you have in mind?
Ok, I found the numeric substitution blocks in the Filecheck docs. I wasn't aware of that before, thanks.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D66944/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D66944