[PATCH] D66734: [llvm-readobj/llvm-readelf] - Report a proper warning when dumping a broken dynamic relocation.
George Rimar via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 26 07:20:44 PDT 2019
grimar added inline comments.
================
Comment at: test/tools/llvm-readobj/elf-broken-dynamic-reloc-name.test:31
+ Info: 0
+ Address: 0x0
+ Relocations:
----------------
MaskRay wrote:
> `Address` and `Info` can be deleted.
Right, removed.
================
Comment at: test/tools/llvm-readobj/elf-broken-dynamic-reloc-name.test:50
+ProgramHeaders:
+ - Type: PT_LOAD
+ Sections:
----------------
MaskRay wrote:
> Is the PT_LOAD used?
Yeah. Otherwise here we'd have "Unable to parse DT_RELA: virtual address is not in any segment" error.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66734/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66734
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list