[PATCH] D64830: [Xtensa 4/10] Add basic *td files with Xtensa architecture description.

[Ayke via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

aykevl added subscribers: lattner, aykevl.
aykevl added a comment.

I do not think there is a reason why the Xtensa architecture shouldn't be included in LLVM. As a comparison, there is also the proprietary (Google) Lanai architecture which was added at a time when there was little public information on it and to this time nobody can actually buy Lanai hardware (there is only a simulator). As a comparison, Xtensa has easy to get hardware (in the form of the ESP8266/ESP32) and is already supported in GCC/binutils.

Looking back at the email thread, there were very few responses. I wonder what should be done next?
Tagging Chris just in case: @lattner


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D64830/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D64830