[llvm] r369140 - [InstCombine] canonicalize a scalar-select-of-vectors to vector select
Sanjay Patel via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Aug 16 11:51:30 PDT 2019
Author: spatel
Date: Fri Aug 16 11:51:30 2019
New Revision: 369140
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=369140&view=rev
Log:
[InstCombine] canonicalize a scalar-select-of-vectors to vector select
This pattern may arise more frequently with an enhancement to SLP vectorization suggested in PR42755:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42755
...but we should handle this pattern to make things easier for the backend either way.
For all in-tree targets that I looked at, codegen for typical vector sizes looks better when we change
to a vector select, so this is safe to do without a cost model (in other words, as a target-independent
canonicalization).
For example, if the condition of the select is a scalar, we end up with something like this on x86:
vpcmpgtd %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
vpextrb $12, %xmm0, %eax
testb $1, %al
jne LBB0_2
## %bb.1:
vmovaps %xmm3, %xmm2
LBB0_2:
vmovaps %xmm2, %xmm0
Rather than the splat-condition variant:
vpcmpgtd %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
vpshufd $255, %xmm0, %xmm0 ## xmm0 = xmm0[3,3,3,3]
vblendvps %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm3, %xmm0
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66095
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSelect.cpp
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/InstCombine/select-extractelement.ll
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSelect.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSelect.cpp?rev=369140&r1=369139&r2=369140&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSelect.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSelect.cpp Fri Aug 16 11:51:30 2019
@@ -1696,6 +1696,30 @@ static Instruction *canonicalizeSelectTo
ConstantVector::get(Mask));
}
+/// If we have a select of vectors with a scalar condition, try to convert that
+/// to a vector select by splatting the condition. A splat may get folded with
+/// other operations in IR and having all operands of a select be vector types
+/// is likely better for vector codegen.
+static Instruction *canonicalizeScalarSelectOfVecs(
+ SelectInst &Sel, InstCombiner::BuilderTy &Builder) {
+ Type *Ty = Sel.getType();
+ if (!Ty->isVectorTy())
+ return nullptr;
+
+ // We can replace a single-use extract with constant index.
+ Value *Cond = Sel.getCondition();
+ if (!match(Cond, m_OneUse(m_ExtractElement(m_Value(), m_ConstantInt()))))
+ return nullptr;
+
+ // select (extelt V, Index), T, F --> select (splat V, Index), T, F
+ // Splatting the extracted condition reduces code (we could directly create a
+ // splat shuffle of the source vector to eliminate the intermediate step).
+ unsigned NumElts = Ty->getVectorNumElements();
+ Value *SplatCond = Builder.CreateVectorSplat(NumElts, Cond);
+ Sel.setCondition(SplatCond);
+ return &Sel;
+}
+
/// Reuse bitcasted operands between a compare and select:
/// select (cmp (bitcast C), (bitcast D)), (bitcast' C), (bitcast' D) -->
/// bitcast (select (cmp (bitcast C), (bitcast D)), (bitcast C), (bitcast D))
@@ -1992,6 +2016,9 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitSelectIn
if (Instruction *I = canonicalizeSelectToShuffle(SI))
return I;
+ if (Instruction *I = canonicalizeScalarSelectOfVecs(SI, Builder))
+ return I;
+
// Canonicalize a one-use integer compare with a non-canonical predicate by
// inverting the predicate and swapping the select operands. This matches a
// compare canonicalization for conditional branches.
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/InstCombine/select-extractelement.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/InstCombine/select-extractelement.ll?rev=369140&r1=369139&r2=369140&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/InstCombine/select-extractelement.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/InstCombine/select-extractelement.ll Fri Aug 16 11:51:30 2019
@@ -146,8 +146,8 @@ entry:
define <4 x i32> @extract_cond(<4 x i32> %x, <4 x i32> %y, <4 x i1> %condv) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @extract_cond(
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[COND:%.*]] = extractelement <4 x i1> [[CONDV:%.*]], i32 3
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[R:%.*]] = select i1 [[COND]], <4 x i32> [[X:%.*]], <4 x i32> [[Y:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[DOTSPLAT:%.*]] = shufflevector <4 x i1> [[CONDV:%.*]], <4 x i1> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 3, i32 3, i32 3, i32 3>
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[R:%.*]] = select <4 x i1> [[DOTSPLAT]], <4 x i32> [[X:%.*]], <4 x i32> [[Y:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret <4 x i32> [[R]]
;
%cond = extractelement <4 x i1> %condv, i32 3
@@ -168,6 +168,8 @@ define <4 x i32> @splat_cond(<4 x i32> %
declare void @extra_use(i1)
+; Negative test
+
define <4 x i32> @extract_cond_extra_use(<4 x i32> %x, <4 x i32> %y, <4 x i1> %condv) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @extract_cond_extra_use(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[COND:%.*]] = extractelement <4 x i1> [[CONDV:%.*]], i32 3
@@ -181,6 +183,8 @@ define <4 x i32> @extract_cond_extra_use
ret <4 x i32> %r
}
+; Negative test
+
define <4 x i32> @extract_cond_variable_index(<4 x i32> %x, <4 x i32> %y, <4 x i1> %condv, i32 %index) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @extract_cond_variable_index(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[COND:%.*]] = extractelement <4 x i1> [[CONDV:%.*]], i32 [[INDEX:%.*]]
@@ -192,10 +196,12 @@ define <4 x i32> @extract_cond_variable_
ret <4 x i32> %r
}
+; IR shuffle can alter the number of elements in the vector, so this is ok.
+
define <4 x i32> @extract_cond_type_mismatch(<4 x i32> %x, <4 x i32> %y, <5 x i1> %condv) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @extract_cond_type_mismatch(
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[COND:%.*]] = extractelement <5 x i1> [[CONDV:%.*]], i32 1
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[R:%.*]] = select i1 [[COND]], <4 x i32> [[X:%.*]], <4 x i32> [[Y:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[DOTSPLAT:%.*]] = shufflevector <5 x i1> [[CONDV:%.*]], <5 x i1> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 1, i32 1, i32 1>
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[R:%.*]] = select <4 x i1> [[DOTSPLAT]], <4 x i32> [[X:%.*]], <4 x i32> [[Y:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret <4 x i32> [[R]]
;
%cond = extractelement <5 x i1> %condv, i32 1
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list