[PATCH] D65803: [MVE] Don't try to unroll vectorised MVE loops
Sam Parker via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Aug 6 08:48:00 PDT 2019
samparker added a comment.
Yes, I guess that would be sensible approach! I am worried that one of the (many) passes will trip somewhere, so this gives me another example test case... For performance, I'm still not convinced this is the best approach because (1) we can't depend on metadata and (2) doesn't this also prevent the scalar remainder from being unrolled too?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D65803/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D65803
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list