[PATCH] D63863: [ARM] Make coprocessor number restrictions consistent.
Simon Tatham via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jul 17 02:10:34 PDT 2019
simon_tatham added a comment.
So it sounds as if the most immediate problem is that there now _isn't_ an architecture you can specify on clang's command line that permits the union of all the instructions you plan to use?
Would some kind of architectural extension be a reasonable solution? `-march=armv8+oldcoprocessors`, or some such? That way `-march=armv8` continues to diagnose things that actually are illegal in the architecture you asked for.
Repository:
rL LLVM
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D63863/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D63863
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list