[PATCH] D63863: [ARM] Make coprocessor number restrictions consistent.

[Simon Tatham via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

simon_tatham added a comment.

Hmmm. This surely can't be the first time a case like this has come up. What's the usual solution in other similar situations, when you want to include code for mutually incompatible architectures in the same object because you're going to test at run time which one to execute?


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D63863/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D63863