[llvm] r366241 - [IndVars] Speculative fix for an assertion failure seen in bots
Philip Reames via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jul 16 11:23:50 PDT 2019
Author: reames
Date: Tue Jul 16 11:23:49 2019
New Revision: 366241
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=366241&view=rev
Log:
[IndVars] Speculative fix for an assertion failure seen in bots
I don't have an IR sample which is actually failing, but the issue described in the comment is theoretically possible, and should be guarded against even if there's a different root cause for the bot failures.
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp?rev=366241&r1=366240&r2=366241&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp Tue Jul 16 11:23:49 2019
@@ -2810,7 +2810,12 @@ bool IndVarSimplify::run(Loop *L) {
if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(ExitCount))
continue;
- assert(!ExitCount->isZero() && "Should have been folded above");
+ // This was handled above, but as we form SCEVs, we can sometimes refine
+ // existing ones; this allows exit counts to be folded to zero which
+ // weren't when optimizeLoopExits saw them. Arguably, we should iterate
+ // until stable to handle cases like this better.
+ if (ExitCount->isZero())
+ continue;
PHINode *IndVar = FindLoopCounter(L, ExitingBB, ExitCount, SE, DT);
if (!IndVar)
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list