[PATCH] D64614: [clangd] Mark type hierarchy as a supported feature in the docs

[Nathan Ridge via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

nridge marked an inline comment as done.
nridge added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/clangd/Features.rst:264
 +-------------------------------------+------------+----------+
-| Type hierarchy                      | No         |   No     |
+| Type hierarchy                      | No         |   Yes    |
 +-------------------------------------+------------+----------+
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> nridge wrote:
> > Should I perhaps change type hierarchy's entry in the LSP column from "No" to "Proposed"?
> I'm not sure what "no" means, if it doesn't mean "proposed".
> 
> Changing the "no" links to say "proposal" and link to it would be useful, I think.
> (And we could delete any rows that don't have a proposal)
Good idea -- I'll look at that in a separate commit.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D64614/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D64614