[llvm] r364637 - [DebugInfo] Simplify GSYM::AddressRange and GSYM::AddressRanges
Shoaib Meenai via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jun 28 22:13:33 PDT 2019
Could you be more specific about the issues you're referring to? I wasn't following https://reviews.llvm.org/D63104 closely, but from a cursory look, it seems like Greg addressed all the comments, got a LGTM from Jake, committed it, and then got more comments after the review. Those comments should also be addressed, of course, but that necessarily has to be a follow-up.
Regardless, if you feel like there were unaddressed comments when the review was committed, pointing them out on the review and asking for a revert depending on their severity seems like the appropriate course of action.
From: Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray at google.com>
Date: Friday, June 28, 2019 at 7:53 PM
To: Shoaib Meenai <smeenai at fb.com>
Cc: "llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org" <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>, Greg Clayton <gclayton at fb.com>
Subject: Re: [llvm] r364637 - [DebugInfo] Simplify GSYM::AddressRange and GSYM::AddressRanges
> Could you please revert this and put the change up for review instead?
Many issues in D63104 were unaddressed when it was committed. I think D63104 should also be reverted if my r364634 and r364637 are to be reverted.
On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 10:49 AM Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray at google.com<mailto:maskray at google.com>> wrote:
I mean the original change D63104. There were many issues unaddressed when committed.
On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 10:48 AM Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray at google.com<mailto:maskray at google.com>> wrote:
Sorry but I think that change was not properly accepted when committed :)
On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 2:28 AM Shoaib Meenai <smeenai at fb.com<mailto:smeenai at fb.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Could you please send changes like this for review? There's reasons the original code was written the way it was; it's certainly possible there's potential for simplification, but we should discuss those simplifications in a review (and make sure those simplifications don't conflict with any intended design decisions or complicate any planned follow-ups) instead of just committing them. Pre-commit review is more appropriate than post-commit review here IMO.
Could you please revert this and put the change up for review instead?
Thanks,
Shoaib
On 6/28/19, 3:06 AM, "llvm-commits on behalf of Fangrui Song via llvm-commits" <llvm-commits-bounces at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-commits-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on behalf of llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
Author: maskray
Date: Fri Jun 28 03:06:11 2019
New Revision: 364637
URL: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_viewvc_llvm-2Dproject-3Frev-3D364637-26view-3Drev&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=9k7U8PQKHsbaC7-lQKaTb9lbupnubmUuPe6K5-QRsFs&s=HHSSOOpecreYY-A_EIkI-32v-3UF3l43QAWHvnAZlzU&e=
Log:
[DebugInfo] Simplify GSYM::AddressRange and GSYM::AddressRanges
Delete unnecessary getters of AddressRange.
Simplify AddressRange::size(): Start <= End check should be checked in an upper layer.
Delete isContiguousWith() that doesn't make sense.
Simplify AddressRanges::insert. Delete commented code. Fix it when more than 1 ranges are to be deleted.
Delete trailing newline.
Modified:
llvm/trunk/include/llvm/DebugInfo/GSYM/FunctionInfo.h
llvm/trunk/include/llvm/DebugInfo/GSYM/Range.h
llvm/trunk/lib/DebugInfo/GSYM/FunctionInfo.cpp
llvm/trunk/lib/DebugInfo/GSYM/InlineInfo.cpp
llvm/trunk/lib/DebugInfo/GSYM/Range.cpp
llvm/trunk/unittests/DebugInfo/GSYM/GSYMTest.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/DebugInfo/GSYM/FunctionInfo.h
URL: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_viewvc_llvm-2Dproject_llvm_trunk_include_llvm_DebugInfo_GSYM_FunctionInfo.h-3Frev-3D364637-26r1-3D364636-26r2-3D364637-26view-3Ddiff&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=9k7U8PQKHsbaC7-lQKaTb9lbupnubmUuPe6K5-QRsFs&s=mmQTOGibvK--0aX6eaTu1duWFnVth5HTuAAKDuTG9Us&e=
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/DebugInfo/GSYM/FunctionInfo.h (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/DebugInfo/GSYM/FunctionInfo.h Fri Jun 28 03:06:11 2019
@@ -56,15 +56,15 @@ struct FunctionInfo {
return Name != 0;
}
- uint64_t startAddress() const { return Range.startAddress(); }
- uint64_t endAddress() const { return Range.endAddress(); }
+ uint64_t startAddress() const { return Range.Start; }
+ uint64_t endAddress() const { return Range.End; }
uint64_t size() const { return Range.size(); }
- void setStartAddress(uint64_t Addr) { Range.setStartAddress(Addr); }
- void setEndAddress(uint64_t Addr) { Range.setEndAddress(Addr); }
- void setSize(uint64_t Size) { Range.setSize(Size); }
+ void setStartAddress(uint64_t Addr) { Range.End = Addr; }
+ void setEndAddress(uint64_t Addr) { Range.End = Addr; }
+ void setSize(uint64_t Size) { Range.End = Range.Start + Size; }
void clear() {
- Range.clear();
+ Range = {0, 0};
Name = 0;
Lines.clear();
Inline.clear();
Modified: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/DebugInfo/GSYM/Range.h
URL: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_viewvc_llvm-2Dproject_llvm_trunk_include_llvm_DebugInfo_GSYM_Range.h-3Frev-3D364637-26r1-3D364636-26r2-3D364637-26view-3Ddiff&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=9k7U8PQKHsbaC7-lQKaTb9lbupnubmUuPe6K5-QRsFs&s=EMTyHM9NH0f4YtAPDT4VF_4qaLWLyOsNfflwielcy7g&e=
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/DebugInfo/GSYM/Range.h (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/DebugInfo/GSYM/Range.h Fri Jun 28 03:06:11 2019
@@ -27,58 +27,28 @@ namespace gsym {
/// A class that represents an address range. The range is specified using
/// a start and an end address.
-class AddressRange {
+struct AddressRange {
uint64_t Start;
uint64_t End;
-public:
- AddressRange(uint64_t S = 0, uint64_t E = 0) : Start(S), End(E) {}
- /// Access to the size must use the size() accessor to ensure the correct
- /// answer. This allows an AddressRange to be constructed with invalid
- /// address ranges where the end address is less that the start address
- /// either because it was not set, or because of incorrect data.
- uint64_t size() const { return Start < End ? End - Start : 0; }
- void setStartAddress(uint64_t Addr) { Start = Addr; }
- void setEndAddress(uint64_t Addr) { End = Addr; }
- void setSize(uint64_t Size) { End = Start + Size; }
- uint64_t startAddress() const { return Start; }
- /// Access to the end address must use the size() accessor to ensure the
- /// correct answer. This allows an AddressRange to be constructed with
- /// invalid address ranges where the end address is less that the start
- /// address either because it was not set, or because of incorrect data.
- uint64_t endAddress() const { return Start + size(); }
- void clear() {
- Start = 0;
- End = 0;
+ AddressRange() : Start(0), End(0) {}
+ AddressRange(uint64_t S, uint64_t E) : Start(S), End(E) {}
+ uint64_t size() const { return End - Start; }
+ bool contains(uint64_t Addr) const { return Start <= Addr && Addr < End; }
+ bool intersects(const AddressRange &R) const {
+ return Start < R.End && R.Start < End;
}
- bool contains(uint64_t Addr) const { return Start <= Addr && Addr < endAddress(); }
- bool isContiguousWith(const AddressRange &R) const {
- return (Start <= R.endAddress()) && (endAddress() >= R.Start);
+
+ bool operator==(const AddressRange &R) const {
+ return Start == R.Start && End == R.End;
}
- bool intersects(const AddressRange &R) const {
- return (Start < R.endAddress()) && (endAddress() > R.Start);
+ bool operator!=(const AddressRange &R) const {
+ return !(*this == R);
}
- bool intersect(const AddressRange &R) {
- if (intersects(R)) {
- Start = std::min<uint64_t>(Start, R.Start);
- End = std::max<uint64_t>(endAddress(), R.endAddress());
- return true;
- }
- return false;
+ bool operator<(const AddressRange &R) const {
+ return std::make_pair(Start, End) < std::make_pair(R.Start, R.End);
}
};
-inline bool operator==(const AddressRange &LHS, const AddressRange &RHS) {
- return LHS.startAddress() == RHS.startAddress() && LHS.endAddress() == RHS.endAddress();
-}
-inline bool operator!=(const AddressRange &LHS, const AddressRange &RHS) {
- return LHS.startAddress() != RHS.startAddress() || LHS.endAddress() != RHS.endAddress();
-}
-inline bool operator<(const AddressRange &LHS, const AddressRange &RHS) {
- if (LHS.startAddress() == RHS.startAddress())
- return LHS.endAddress() < RHS.endAddress();
- return LHS.startAddress() < RHS.startAddress();
-}
-
raw_ostream &operator<<(raw_ostream &OS, const AddressRange &R);
/// The AddressRanges class helps normalize address range collections.
@@ -96,7 +66,7 @@ public:
void clear() { Ranges.clear(); }
bool empty() const { return Ranges.empty(); }
bool contains(uint64_t Addr) const;
- void insert(const AddressRange &R);
+ void insert(AddressRange Range);
size_t size() const { return Ranges.size(); }
bool operator==(const AddressRanges &RHS) const {
return Ranges == RHS.Ranges;
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/DebugInfo/GSYM/FunctionInfo.cpp
URL: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_viewvc_llvm-2Dproject_llvm_trunk_lib_DebugInfo_GSYM_FunctionInfo.cpp-3Frev-3D364637-26r1-3D364636-26r2-3D364637-26view-3Ddiff&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=9k7U8PQKHsbaC7-lQKaTb9lbupnubmUuPe6K5-QRsFs&s=sUHcNNabUTGc7vOIFREnTXOitPy11EE0XyMja95XYno&e=
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/DebugInfo/GSYM/FunctionInfo.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/DebugInfo/GSYM/FunctionInfo.cpp Fri Jun 28 03:06:11 2019
@@ -13,8 +13,7 @@ using namespace llvm;
using namespace gsym;
raw_ostream &llvm::gsym::operator<<(raw_ostream &OS, const FunctionInfo &FI) {
- OS << '[' << HEX64(FI.Range.startAddress()) << '-'
- << HEX64(FI.Range.endAddress()) << "): "
+ OS << '[' << HEX64(FI.Range.Start) << '-' << HEX64(FI.Range.End) << "): "
<< "Name=" << HEX32(FI.Name) << '\n';
for (const auto &Line : FI.Lines)
OS << Line << '\n';
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/DebugInfo/GSYM/InlineInfo.cpp
URL: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_viewvc_llvm-2Dproject_llvm_trunk_lib_DebugInfo_GSYM_InlineInfo.cpp-3Frev-3D364637-26r1-3D364636-26r2-3D364637-26view-3Ddiff&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=9k7U8PQKHsbaC7-lQKaTb9lbupnubmUuPe6K5-QRsFs&s=hfxnzru6HE2peOD0j7_rKzCpPPZkGKjaFG9coTTnddA&e=
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/DebugInfo/GSYM/InlineInfo.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/DebugInfo/GSYM/InlineInfo.cpp Fri Jun 28 03:06:11 2019
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ raw_ostream &llvm::gsym::operator<<(raw_
return OS;
}
-static bool getInlineStackHelper(const InlineInfo &II, uint64_t Addr,
+static bool getInlineStackHelper(const InlineInfo &II, uint64_t Addr,
std::vector<const InlineInfo *> &InlineStack) {
if (II.Ranges.contains(Addr)) {
// If this is the top level that represents the concrete function,
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/DebugInfo/GSYM/Range.cpp
URL: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_viewvc_llvm-2Dproject_llvm_trunk_lib_DebugInfo_GSYM_Range.cpp-3Frev-3D364637-26r1-3D364636-26r2-3D364637-26view-3Ddiff&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=9k7U8PQKHsbaC7-lQKaTb9lbupnubmUuPe6K5-QRsFs&s=GXQpX_tQFMdcEJojiF98ivqbX50mCp5gZgyG8Ihi1L8&e=
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/DebugInfo/GSYM/Range.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/DebugInfo/GSYM/Range.cpp Fri Jun 28 03:06:11 2019
@@ -15,53 +15,41 @@ using namespace llvm;
using namespace gsym;
-void AddressRanges::insert(const AddressRange &Range) {
+void AddressRanges::insert(AddressRange Range) {
if (Range.size() == 0)
return;
- // Ranges.insert(std::upper_bound(Ranges.begin(), Ranges.end(), Range), Range);
- // // Check if an existing range intersects with this range, and if so,
- // // grow the intersecting ranges instead of adding a new one.
- auto Begin = Ranges.begin();
- auto End = Ranges.end();
- const auto Iter = std::upper_bound(Begin, End, Range);
- if (Iter != Begin) {
- auto PrevIter = Iter - 1;
- // If the previous range itersects with "Range" they will be combined.
- if (PrevIter->intersect(Range)) {
- // Now check if the previous range intersects with the next range since
- // the previous range was combined. If so, combine them and remove the
- // next range.
- if (Iter != End && PrevIter->intersect(*Iter))
- Ranges.erase(Iter);
- return;
- }
+ auto It = llvm::upper_bound(Ranges, Range);
+ auto It2 = It;
+ while (It2 != Ranges.end() && It2->Start < Range.End)
+ ++It2;
+ if (It != It2) {
+ Range.End = std::max(Range.End, It2[-1].End);
+ It = Ranges.erase(It, It2);
}
- // If the next range intersects with "Range", combined and return.
- if (Iter != End && Iter->intersect(Range))
- return;
- Ranges.insert(Iter, Range);
+ if (It != Ranges.begin() && Range.Start < It[-1].End)
+ It[-1].End = std::max(It[-1].End, Range.End);
+ else
+ Ranges.insert(It, Range);
}
bool AddressRanges::contains(uint64_t Addr) const {
auto It = std::partition_point(
Ranges.begin(), Ranges.end(),
- [=](const AddressRange &R) { return R.startAddress() <= Addr; });
- return It != Ranges.begin() && It[-1].contains(Addr);
+ [=](const AddressRange &R) { return R.Start <= Addr; });
+ return It != Ranges.begin() && Addr < It[-1].End;
}
raw_ostream &llvm::gsym::operator<<(raw_ostream &OS, const AddressRange &R) {
- return OS << '[' << HEX64(R.startAddress()) << " - " << HEX64(R.endAddress())
- << ")";
+ return OS << '[' << HEX64(R.Start) << " - " << HEX64(R.End) << ")";
}
raw_ostream &llvm::gsym::operator<<(raw_ostream &OS, const AddressRanges &AR) {
size_t Size = AR.size();
- for (size_t I=0; I<Size; ++I) {
+ for (size_t I = 0; I < Size; ++I) {
if (I)
OS << ' ';
OS << AR[I];
}
return OS;
}
-
Modified: llvm/trunk/unittests/DebugInfo/GSYM/GSYMTest.cpp
URL: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_viewvc_llvm-2Dproject_llvm_trunk_unittests_DebugInfo_GSYM_GSYMTest.cpp-3Frev-3D364637-26r1-3D364636-26r2-3D364637-26view-3Ddiff&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=9k7U8PQKHsbaC7-lQKaTb9lbupnubmUuPe6K5-QRsFs&s=dOdDQ6bFYyyjxoLnolMX58e1M7nkR346P3arFOgQneE&e=
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/unittests/DebugInfo/GSYM/GSYMTest.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/unittests/DebugInfo/GSYM/GSYMTest.cpp Fri Jun 28 03:06:11 2019
@@ -179,33 +179,33 @@ TEST(GSYMTest, TestInlineInfo) {
EXPECT_FALSE(Root.getInlineStack(0x50));
// Verify that we get no inline stacks for addresses out of [0x100-0x200)
- EXPECT_FALSE(Root.getInlineStack(Root.Ranges[0].startAddress() - 1));
- EXPECT_FALSE(Root.getInlineStack(Root.Ranges[0].endAddress()));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(Root.getInlineStack(Root.Ranges[0].Start - 1));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(Root.getInlineStack(Root.Ranges[0].End));
// Verify we get no inline stack entries for addresses that are in
// [0x100-0x200) but not in [0x150-0x160)
- EXPECT_FALSE(Root.getInlineStack(Inline1.Ranges[0].startAddress() - 1));
- EXPECT_FALSE(Root.getInlineStack(Inline1.Ranges[0].endAddress()));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(Root.getInlineStack(Inline1.Ranges[0].Start - 1));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(Root.getInlineStack(Inline1.Ranges[0].End));
// Verify we get one inline stack entry for addresses that are in
// [[0x150-0x160)) but not in [0x152-0x155) or [0x157-0x158)
- auto InlineInfos = Root.getInlineStack(Inline1.Ranges[0].startAddress());
+ auto InlineInfos = Root.getInlineStack(Inline1.Ranges[0].Start);
ASSERT_TRUE(InlineInfos);
ASSERT_EQ(InlineInfos->size(), 1u);
ASSERT_EQ(*InlineInfos->at(0), Inline1);
- InlineInfos = Root.getInlineStack(Inline1.Ranges[0].endAddress() - 1);
+ InlineInfos = Root.getInlineStack(Inline1.Ranges[0].End - 1);
EXPECT_TRUE(InlineInfos);
ASSERT_EQ(InlineInfos->size(), 1u);
ASSERT_EQ(*InlineInfos->at(0), Inline1);
// Verify we get two inline stack entries for addresses that are in
// [0x152-0x155)
- InlineInfos = Root.getInlineStack(Inline1Sub1.Ranges[0].startAddress());
+ InlineInfos = Root.getInlineStack(Inline1Sub1.Ranges[0].Start);
EXPECT_TRUE(InlineInfos);
ASSERT_EQ(InlineInfos->size(), 2u);
ASSERT_EQ(*InlineInfos->at(0), Inline1Sub1);
ASSERT_EQ(*InlineInfos->at(1), Inline1);
- InlineInfos = Root.getInlineStack(Inline1Sub1.Ranges[0].endAddress() - 1);
+ InlineInfos = Root.getInlineStack(Inline1Sub1.Ranges[0].End - 1);
EXPECT_TRUE(InlineInfos);
ASSERT_EQ(InlineInfos->size(), 2u);
ASSERT_EQ(*InlineInfos->at(0), Inline1Sub1);
@@ -213,12 +213,12 @@ TEST(GSYMTest, TestInlineInfo) {
// Verify we get two inline stack entries for addresses that are in
// [0x157-0x158)
- InlineInfos = Root.getInlineStack(Inline1Sub2.Ranges[0].startAddress());
+ InlineInfos = Root.getInlineStack(Inline1Sub2.Ranges[0].Start);
EXPECT_TRUE(InlineInfos);
ASSERT_EQ(InlineInfos->size(), 2u);
ASSERT_EQ(*InlineInfos->at(0), Inline1Sub2);
ASSERT_EQ(*InlineInfos->at(1), Inline1);
- InlineInfos = Root.getInlineStack(Inline1Sub2.Ranges[0].endAddress() - 1);
+ InlineInfos = Root.getInlineStack(Inline1Sub2.Ranges[0].End - 1);
EXPECT_TRUE(InlineInfos);
ASSERT_EQ(InlineInfos->size(), 2u);
ASSERT_EQ(*InlineInfos->at(0), Inline1Sub2);
@@ -257,8 +257,6 @@ TEST(GSYMTest, TestRanges) {
const uint64_t EndAddr = 0x2000;
// Verify constructor and API to ensure it takes start and end address.
const AddressRange Range(StartAddr, EndAddr);
- EXPECT_EQ(Range.startAddress(), StartAddr);
- EXPECT_EQ(Range.endAddress(), EndAddr);
EXPECT_EQ(Range.size(), EndAddr - StartAddr);
// Verify llvm::gsym::AddressRange::contains().
@@ -291,9 +289,9 @@ TEST(GSYMTest, TestRanges) {
EXPECT_LT(Range, RangeDifferentEnd);
EXPECT_LT(Range, RangeDifferentStartEnd);
// Test "bool operator<(const AddressRange &, uint64_t)"
- EXPECT_LT(Range, StartAddr + 1);
+ EXPECT_LT(Range.Start, StartAddr + 1);
// Test "bool operator<(uint64_t, const AddressRange &)"
- EXPECT_LT(StartAddr - 1, Range);
+ EXPECT_LT(StartAddr - 1, Range.Start);
// Verify llvm::gsym::AddressRange::isContiguousWith() and
// llvm::gsym::AddressRange::intersects().
@@ -305,14 +303,6 @@ TEST(GSYMTest, TestRanges) {
const AddressRange StartsAtRangeEnd(EndAddr, EndAddr + 0x100);
const AddressRange StartsAfterRangeEnd(EndAddr + 1, EndAddr + 0x100);
- EXPECT_FALSE(Range.isContiguousWith(EndsBeforeRangeStart));
- EXPECT_TRUE(Range.isContiguousWith(EndsAtRangeStart));
- EXPECT_TRUE(Range.isContiguousWith(OverlapsRangeStart));
- EXPECT_TRUE(Range.isContiguousWith(InsideRange));
- EXPECT_TRUE(Range.isContiguousWith(OverlapsRangeEnd));
- EXPECT_TRUE(Range.isContiguousWith(StartsAtRangeEnd));
- EXPECT_FALSE(Range.isContiguousWith(StartsAfterRangeEnd));
-
EXPECT_FALSE(Range.intersects(EndsBeforeRangeStart));
EXPECT_FALSE(Range.intersects(EndsAtRangeStart));
EXPECT_TRUE(Range.intersects(OverlapsRangeStart));
@@ -350,12 +340,12 @@ TEST(GSYMTest, TestRanges) {
EXPECT_EQ(Ranges[0], AddressRange(0x1100, 0x1F00));
// Verify a range that starts before and intersects gets combined.
- Ranges.insert(AddressRange(0x1000, Ranges[0].startAddress() + 1));
+ Ranges.insert(AddressRange(0x1000, Ranges[0].Start + 1));
EXPECT_EQ(Ranges.size(), 1u);
EXPECT_EQ(Ranges[0], AddressRange(0x1000, 0x1F00));
// Verify a range that starts inside and extends ranges gets combined.
- Ranges.insert(AddressRange(Ranges[0].endAddress() - 1, 0x2000));
+ Ranges.insert(AddressRange(Ranges[0].End - 1, 0x2000));
EXPECT_EQ(Ranges.size(), 1u);
EXPECT_EQ(Ranges[0], AddressRange(0x1000, 0x2000));
@@ -366,10 +356,15 @@ TEST(GSYMTest, TestRanges) {
EXPECT_EQ(Ranges[1], AddressRange(0x2000, 0x3000));
// Verify if we add an address range that intersects two ranges
// that they get combined
- Ranges.insert(
- AddressRange(Ranges[0].endAddress() - 1, Ranges[1].startAddress() + 1));
+ Ranges.insert(AddressRange(Ranges[0].End - 1, Ranges[1].Start + 1));
EXPECT_EQ(Ranges.size(), 1u);
EXPECT_EQ(Ranges[0], AddressRange(0x1000, 0x3000));
+
+ Ranges.insert(AddressRange(0x3000, 0x4000));
+ Ranges.insert(AddressRange(0x4000, 0x5000));
+ Ranges.insert(AddressRange(0x2000, 0x4500));
+ EXPECT_EQ(Ranges.size(), 1u);
+ EXPECT_EQ(Ranges[0], AddressRange(0x1000, 0x5000));
}
TEST(GSYMTest, TestStringTable) {
_______________________________________________
llvm-commits mailing list
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.llvm.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_llvm-2Dcommits&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=9k7U8PQKHsbaC7-lQKaTb9lbupnubmUuPe6K5-QRsFs&s=xxXTzX5HBWrjAYbiATYKI3lg2yAC_Wqg61ov6xSFL2o&e=
--
宋方睿
--
宋方睿
--
宋方睿
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20190629/95379311/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list