[PATCH] D63609: [SLP] Support unary FNeg vectorization

[Sanjay Patel via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

spatel added a comment.

In D63609#1556022 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D63609#1556022>, @spatel wrote:

> > If I'm understanding the code correctly, I've added a small change to treat a unary FNeg as a generic FP operation. That's probably not so accurate though...
>
> Is that any different than what we have today? Ie, there's no cost model specialization for 'fsub -0.0, X'?


Answering myself - doesn't look like anything has changed since:
D62444 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D62444> / rL361788 <https://reviews.llvm.org/rL361788>


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D63609/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D63609