[PATCH] D63060: [InstCombine] usub.sat(a, b) + b => umax(a, b) (PR42178)

[Dávid Bolvanský via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

xbolva00 added a subscriber: efriedma.
xbolva00 added a comment.

I would like to ask if the increase of uses due to new transformation is generally banned in InstCombine (any pattern which we would like to fold to min/max pattern) or not? If banned, what is acceptable solution for such cases ?

@spatel @efriedma


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D63060/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D63060