[PATCH] D63476: [ARM] DLS/LE low-overhead loop code generation

[Sjoerd Meijer via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

SjoerdMeijer added a comment.

> How confident are you that this is always valid?

What are our options here?

I guess one of them is making sure literal pools won't get placed inside loops, or reordering this:

  addPass(createARMFinalizeLoopsPass());
  addPass(createARMConstantIslandPass());

or is there a reason we can't do this?


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D63476/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D63476