[PATCH] D63447: [ARM] Put some of the TTI costmodel behind hasNeon calls.

[Sjoerd Meijer via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

SjoerdMeijer added a comment.

No, I am not sure either, can't propose anything.
Creating helper functions, lambdas, etc. might be good enough.

Perhaps you see if you can refactor getShuffleCost a bit, avoid the big if-block by returning early.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D63447/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D63447