[PATCH] D63011: [docs]Move llvm-readobj from "Developer Tools" to "Basic Commands"

[Jordan Rupprecht via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

rupprecht added a comment.

In D63011#1534305 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D63011#1534305>, @jhenderson wrote:

> In D63011#1534304 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D63011#1534304>, @rupprecht wrote:
>
> > I actually wonder if we should split out all the binary utilities to a separate section. We should try to advertise the replacement-ness of all the tools we have.
>
>
> That's probably not a bad shout, though we'd have to figure out exactly what we mean by "binary utilities" as I suspect everybody has a slightly different interpretation of this. Maybe a section labelled "GNU replacements"


SGTM. There's a definitive list of that here: https://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/

> (note that llvm-readobj wouldn't actually qualify under this!)?

I think that's fine -- we should list `llvm-readelf` in the GNU replacement with a simple page that explains the difference and links to `llvm-readobj` (see the doc we have for `llvm-addr2line` for instance)

Actually, maybe I'll just rephrase this in the form of a patch...


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D63011/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D63011