[llvm] r361218 - [PowerPC] use more meaningful name - NFC

[Chen Zheng via llvm-commits]

Author: shchenz
Date: Mon May 20 20:54:42 2019
New Revision: 361218

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=361218&view=rev
Log:
[PowerPC] use more meaningful name - NFC

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelLowering.cpp

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelLowering.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelLowering.cpp?rev=361218&r1=361217&r2=361218&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelLowering.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelLowering.cpp Mon May 20 20:54:42 2019
@@ -2299,12 +2299,12 @@ static void fixupFuncForFI(SelectionDAG
 
 /// Returns true if the address N can be represented by a base register plus
 /// a signed 16-bit displacement [r+imm], and if it is not better
-/// represented as reg+reg.  If \p Alignment is non-zero, only accept
+/// represented as reg+reg.  If \p EncodingAlignment is non-zero, only accept
 /// displacements that are multiples of that value.
 bool PPCTargetLowering::SelectAddressRegImm(SDValue N, SDValue &Disp,
                                             SDValue &Base,
                                             SelectionDAG &DAG,
-                                            unsigned Alignment) const {
+                                            unsigned EncodingAlignment) const {
   // FIXME dl should come from parent load or store, not from address
   SDLoc dl(N);
   // If this can be more profitably realized as r+r, fail.
@@ -2314,7 +2314,7 @@ bool PPCTargetLowering::SelectAddressReg
   if (N.getOpcode() == ISD::ADD) {
     int16_t imm = 0;
     if (isIntS16Immediate(N.getOperand(1), imm) &&
-        (!Alignment || (imm % Alignment) == 0)) {
+        (!EncodingAlignment || (imm % EncodingAlignment) == 0)) {
       Disp = DAG.getTargetConstant(imm, dl, N.getValueType());
       if (FrameIndexSDNode *FI = dyn_cast<FrameIndexSDNode>(N.getOperand(0))) {
         Base = DAG.getTargetFrameIndex(FI->getIndex(), N.getValueType());
@@ -2338,7 +2338,7 @@ bool PPCTargetLowering::SelectAddressReg
   } else if (N.getOpcode() == ISD::OR) {
     int16_t imm = 0;
     if (isIntS16Immediate(N.getOperand(1), imm) &&
-        (!Alignment || (imm % Alignment) == 0)) {
+        (!EncodingAlignment || (imm % EncodingAlignment) == 0)) {
       // If this is an or of disjoint bitfields, we can codegen this as an add
       // (for better address arithmetic) if the LHS and RHS of the OR are
       // provably disjoint.
@@ -2364,7 +2364,8 @@ bool PPCTargetLowering::SelectAddressReg
     // If this address fits entirely in a 16-bit sext immediate field, codegen
     // this as "d, 0"
     int16_t Imm;
-    if (isIntS16Immediate(CN, Imm) && (!Alignment || (Imm % Alignment) == 0)) {
+    if (isIntS16Immediate(CN, Imm) &&
+        (!EncodingAlignment || (Imm % EncodingAlignment) == 0)) {
       Disp = DAG.getTargetConstant(Imm, dl, CN->getValueType(0));
       Base = DAG.getRegister(Subtarget.isPPC64() ? PPC::ZERO8 : PPC::ZERO,
                              CN->getValueType(0));
@@ -2374,7 +2375,7 @@ bool PPCTargetLowering::SelectAddressReg
     // Handle 32-bit sext immediates with LIS + addr mode.
     if ((CN->getValueType(0) == MVT::i32 ||
          (int64_t)CN->getZExtValue() == (int)CN->getZExtValue()) &&
-        (!Alignment || (CN->getZExtValue() % Alignment) == 0)) {
+        (!EncodingAlignment || (CN->getZExtValue() % EncodingAlignment) == 0)) {
       int Addr = (int)CN->getZExtValue();
 
       // Otherwise, break this down into an LIS + disp.