[PATCH] D62067: [Support] Time profiler: support new PassManager

[Roman Lebedev via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

lebedev.ri added a comment.

I know this is in line with what is done in old-pm, but i find the middle-end names to be very useless.
In particular, why is the actual optimization pass name is always in the description, and the actual timeslice name is always the same generic "Opt???"?
IMHO the actual optimization pass name should be the Name, not Detail.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D62067/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D62067