[PATCH] D61901: AMDGPU: Assume xnack is enabled by default

[Matt Arsenault via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

arsenm added a comment.

In D61901#1501695 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D61901#1501695>, @rampitec wrote:

> Why do we have both xnack and no-xnack? I thought we are going to drop xnack feature in favor of no-xnack.


No, my intention is to avoid having no- features, and just use +/- on the positive feature name. The new feature isn't intended for any frontends to set, and is only for marking targets in the backend where the option doesn't do anything.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D61901/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D61901