[PATCH] D61550: Add recommendations on how to start a meetup in your city

[Alex Denisov via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

AlexDenisov marked 2 inline comments as done.
AlexDenisov added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/docs/MeetupGuidelines.rst:21
+* Beware of cultural differences: what works well in the US may not work in
+  Europe or Asia.
+* Do not be alone to organize the meetup. Try to work with a couple other
----------------
siedentop wrote:
> mehdi_amini wrote:
> > AlexDenisov wrote:
> > > siedentop wrote:
> > > > This might potentially be offensive to those in the Americas but not the US. 
> > > Very good point, I'll update this.
> > Actually I am not sure it is better now: it can be seen as conflating "America" with "US" (as if there is a single culture in America).
> > What about "what works well in one country may not work in others"? Or if you want to be specific "what works well in the US may not work elsewhere in America or on another continent" (the latter acknowledges specially that US != America)
> Good point, @mehdi_amini. From the two, I would prefer the generic version without referring to any continents. The other option only mentions the US and America, without reference to Asia and Europe. 
> 
> Any way, it is not the most important topic ;) Are there any LLVM socials in Antarctica yet? (No, I checked.)
After a break I've got to a similar conclusion, it's better to not mention any country or a region in general. I'll update that.


================
Comment at: llvm/docs/MeetupGuidelines.rst:14
+  tailored towards offline events
+  (`example <https://berlincodeofconduct.org>`_).
+* Although not mandatory, your group could be using the https://meetup.com
----------------
mehdi_amini wrote:
> This is tricky, if you organize an LLVM Social and intend to advertise it on the LLVM mailing list, the LLVM CoC should always apply*, it'd be strange to have a CoC for the social which is less specific than the LLVM one for instance.
> 
> *: the CoC mentions that it applies to "LLVM events such as the developer meetings and socials".
> 
Hm, I certainly missed that. In Berlin, we are not using LLVM's CoC. I think the reason was that it did not exist when we started (I just checked, and indeed the meetup group was created two weeks after the first draft has landed).
I can remove the line about "any other CoC" if there is a strict requirement for the socials to follow LLVM's CoC.

If that's the case, then we'll need to reconsider code of conduct we are following at Berlin socials, but honestly, I don't think it's worth the effort, especially given that Berlin CoC does not contradict LLVM's CoC.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D61550/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D61550