[llvm] r359693 - [SCEV] Use isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning for smax simplification
Keno Fischer via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed May 1 08:58:24 PDT 2019
Author: kfischer
Date: Wed May 1 08:58:24 2019
New Revision: 359693
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=359693&view=rev
Log:
[SCEV] Use isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning for smax simplification
Summary:
Commit
rL331949: SCEV] Do not use induction in isKnownPredicate for simplification umax
changed the codepath for umax from isKnownPredicate to
isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning to avoid compile time blow up (and as
I found out also stack overflows). However, there is an exact copy of
the code for umax that was lacking this change. In D50167 I want to unify
these codepaths, but to avoid that being a behavior change for the smax
case, pull this independent bit out of it.
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61166
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp?rev=359693&r1=359692&r2=359693&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp Wed May 1 08:58:24 2019
@@ -3605,11 +3605,12 @@ ScalarEvolution::getSMaxExpr(SmallVector
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Ops.size()-1; i != e; ++i)
// X smax Y smax Y --> X smax Y
// X smax Y --> X, if X is always greater than Y
- if (Ops[i] == Ops[i+1] ||
- isKnownPredicate(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE, Ops[i], Ops[i+1])) {
+ if (Ops[i] == Ops[i + 1] || isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(
+ ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE, Ops[i], Ops[i + 1])) {
Ops.erase(Ops.begin()+i+1, Ops.begin()+i+2);
--i; --e;
- } else if (isKnownPredicate(ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE, Ops[i], Ops[i+1])) {
+ } else if (isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE, Ops[i],
+ Ops[i + 1])) {
Ops.erase(Ops.begin()+i, Ops.begin()+i+1);
--i; --e;
}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list