[PATCH] D58704: Initial (incomplete) implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld.
Bjorn Pettersson via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Apr 23 13:52:56 PDT 2019
bjope added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/trunk/lib/ExecutionEngine/JITLink/JITLinkGeneric.cpp:161
+ auto &SL = KV.second;
+ std::sort(SL.ContentSections.begin(), SL.ContentSections.end(),
+ CompareByOrdinal);
----------------
This is a post commit comment, but I just wanted to inform that the CodingStandards.rst says "As a rule of thumb, always make sure to use llvm::sort instead of std::sort.". Afaik there has been some general cleanup to replace all std::sort uses by llvm::sort. It might still be ongoing for some projects but I think "llvm" was cleaned up some time ago.
(I think main problem with std::sort is when having several equal keys, I haven't looked at the code here to see if it is a problem, I only noticed that some new uses of std::sort had popped up when browsing the code)
Repository:
rL LLVM
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list