[PATCH] D57504: RFC: Prototype & Roadmap for vector predication in LLVM
Hideki Saito via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Apr 16 14:27:06 PDT 2019
hsaito added a comment.
In D57504#1468510 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57504#1468510>, @simoll wrote:
> 1. Updates
> - added constrained fp intrinsics (IR level only).
> - initial support for mapping `llvm.experimental.constrained.*` intrinsics to `llvm.vp.constrained.*`.
Do we really need both vp.fadd() and vp.constrained.fadd()? Can't we just use the latter with rmInvalid/ebInvalid? That should prevent vp.constrained.fadd from losing optimizations w/o good reasons.
Do we have enough upside in having both?
Repository:
rL LLVM
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D57504/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D57504
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list