[PATCH] D60657: [RISCV] Fix evaluation of %pcrel_lo

[James Clarke via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

jrtc27 added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/MCTargetDesc/RISCVAsmBackend.cpp:59
+      MCFragment *FixupFragment = Fixup.getValue()->findAssociatedFragment();
+      ShouldForce = !TFragment || !FixupFragment ||
+                    TFragment->getParent() != FixupFragment->getParent();
----------------
Is it even possible to not have a valid `FixupFragment`? Isn't that effectively how we found `T` in the first place in `getPCRelHiFixup`?


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D60657/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D60657