[PATCH] D60395: [InstCombine] Canonicalize (-X s/ Y) to -(X s/ Y)

Roman Lebedev via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Apr 8 08:00:57 PDT 2019

Previous message: [PATCH] D60395: [InstCombine] Canonicalize (-X s/ Y) to -(X s/ Y)
Next message: [PATCH] D60395: [InstCombine] Canonicalize (-X s/ Y) to -(X s/ Y)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

lebedev.ri added a comment.

Given that this doesn't fall into endless loop, i guess we don't do reverse transform.
I'm just wondering, this is the direction we should be doing it? @spatel


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D60395/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D60395

Previous message: [PATCH] D60395: [InstCombine] Canonicalize (-X s/ Y) to -(X s/ Y)
Next message: [PATCH] D60395: [InstCombine] Canonicalize (-X s/ Y) to -(X s/ Y)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list