[llvm] r357409 - Commit accidentally omitted test case.

[Caroline Tice via llvm-commits]

Author: ctice
Date: Mon Apr  1 09:29:40 2019
New Revision: 357409

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=357409&view=rev
Log:
Commit accidentally omitted test case.

This test case was approved as part of
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49434, but was accidentally
omitted from the final commit.


Added:
    llvm/trunk/test/ThinLTO/X86/builtin-nostrip.ll

Added: llvm/trunk/test/ThinLTO/X86/builtin-nostrip.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/ThinLTO/X86/builtin-nostrip.ll?rev=357409&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/ThinLTO/X86/builtin-nostrip.ll (added)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/ThinLTO/X86/builtin-nostrip.ll Mon Apr  1 09:29:40 2019
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+; REQUIRES: x86-registered-target
+; Compile with thinlto indices, to enable thinlto.
+; RUN: opt -module-summary %s -o %t1.bc
+
+; Test old lto interface with thinlto (currently known to be broken, so
+; the FileCheck line is commented out).
+; FIXME:  The new LTO implementation has been fixed to not internalize
+; (and later dead-code-eliminate) builtin functions.  However the old LTO
+; implementation still internalizes them, and when used with ThinLTO they
+; get dead-code eliminated before the optimizations run that insert calls
+; to them (thus breaking these inserted calls).  This needs to be fixed.
+; RUN: llvm-lto -exported-symbol=main -thinlto-action=run %t1.bc
+;;; RUN llvm-nm %t1.bc.thinlto.o | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NM
+
+; Test new lto interface with thinlto.
+; RUN: llvm-lto2 run %t1.bc -o %t.out -save-temps \
+; RUN:   -r %t1.bc,bar,pl \
+; RUN:   -r %t1.bc,__stack_chk_fail,pl
+; RUN: llvm-nm %t.out.1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NM
+;
+
+; Re-compile, this time without the thinlto indices.
+; RUN: opt %s -o %t4.bc
+
+; Test the new lto interface without thinlto.
+; RUN: llvm-lto2 run %t4.bc -o %t5.out -save-temps \
+; RUN:   -r %t4.bc,bar,pl \
+; RUN:   -r %t4.bc,__stack_chk_fail,pl 
+; RUN: llvm-nm %t5.out.0 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NM
+
+; Test the old lto interface without thinlto.  For now we need to
+; use a different nm check, because currently the old lto interface
+; internalizes these symbols.  Once the old lto interface gets
+; fixed, we should be able to use the same CHECK-NM tests as the
+; other FileChecks.
+; RUN: llvm-lto -exported-symbol=main %t4.bc -o %t6
+; RUN: llvm-nm %t6 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NM2
+
+; The final binary should not contain any of the dead functions;
+; make sure memmove and memcpy are there.
+; CHECK-NM-NOT: bar
+; CHECK-NM-DAG: T __stack_chk_fail
+; CHECK-NM-NOT: bar
+
+; Test case for old lto without thinlto.  Hopefully these can be
+; eliminated once the old lto interface is fixed.
+; CHECK-NM2-DAG: t __stack_chk_fail
+
+target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
+target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
+
+define void @bar() {
+    ret void
+}
+
+
+define void @__stack_chk_fail() {
+    ret void
+}