[PATCH] D59696: [CGP] Build the DominatorTree lazily
Teresa Johnson via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Mar 29 08:56:30 PDT 2019
tejohnson marked an inline comment as done.
tejohnson added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp:345
+ if (!DT)
+ DT = llvm::make_unique<DominatorTree>(F);
+ return *DT;
----------------
spatel wrote:
> fhahn wrote:
> > Would it be worth trying the fetch the DT from the analysis cache for the first time?
> >
> > Also I am not sure about how common CFG changes are here? If we do not make too many changes, I suppose we could save some more time by lazily updating the DT using the update interface.
> Partly addressed in a newer patch from today:
> D59889
> Would it be worth trying the fetch the DT from the analysis cache for the first time?
> Also I am not sure about how common CFG changes are here? If we do not make too many changes, I suppose we could save some more time by lazily updating the DT using the update interface.
Agree these are better long term fixes for this code (which as @spatel and I discussed recently on D59139 has gotten really unwieldy and could do with an overhaul). My familiarity with this pass is very limited though, I have just been doing some fixes to recover from recent compile-time issues.
Repository:
rL LLVM
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59696/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59696
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list