[PATCH] D59844: Reapply "AMDGPU: Scavenge register instead of findUnusedReg"

Matt Arsenault via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Mar 26 14:11:11 PDT 2019


arsenm created this revision.
arsenm added a reviewer: rampitec.
Herald added subscribers: t-tye, tpr, dstuttard, yaxunl, nhaehnle, wdng, jvesely, kzhuravl.

This reapplies r356149, using the correct overload of findUnusedReg
which passes the current iterator.

This worked most of the time, because the scavenger iterator was moved
at the end of the frame index loop in PEI. This would fail if the
spill was the first instruction. This was further hidden by the fact
that the scavenger wasn't passed in for normal frame index
elimination.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D59844

Files:
  lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIRegisterInfo.cpp
  test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/pei-reg-scavenger-position.mir


Index: test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/pei-reg-scavenger-position.mir
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/pei-reg-scavenger-position.mir
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+# NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_mir_test_checks.py
+# RUN: llc -mtriple=amdgcn-amd-amdhsa -verify-machineinstrs -run-pass=prologepilog %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+# The wrong form of scavengeRegister was used, so it wasn't accounting
+# for the iterator passed to eliminateFrameIndex. It was instead using
+# the current iterator in the scavenger, which was not yet set if the
+# spill was the first instruction in the block.
+
+---
+name: scavenge_register_position
+tracksRegLiveness: true
+
+# Force a frame larger than the immediate field with a large alignment.
+stack:
+  - { id: 0, type: default, offset: 4096, size: 4, alignment: 8192 }
+
+machineFunctionInfo:
+  isEntryFunction: true
+body:             |
+  ; CHECK-LABEL: name: scavenge_register_position
+  ; CHECK: bb.0:
+  ; CHECK:   successors: %bb.1(0x80000000)
+  ; CHECK:   $sgpr6 = S_ADD_U32 $sgpr5, 524288, implicit-def $scc
+  ; CHECK:   $vgpr0 = BUFFER_LOAD_DWORD_OFFSET $sgpr0_sgpr1_sgpr2_sgpr3, killed $sgpr6, 0, 0, 0, 0, implicit $exec :: (load 4 from %stack.0, align 8192, addrspace 5)
+  ; CHECK:   S_BRANCH %bb.1
+  ; CHECK: bb.1:
+  ; CHECK:   $sgpr6 = S_ADD_U32 $sgpr5, 524288, implicit-def $scc
+  ; CHECK:   $vgpr0 = BUFFER_LOAD_DWORD_OFFSET $sgpr0_sgpr1_sgpr2_sgpr3, killed $sgpr6, 0, 0, 0, 0, implicit $exec :: (load 4 from %stack.0, align 8192, addrspace 5)
+  ; CHECK:   S_ENDPGM 0, implicit $vgpr0
+  bb.0:
+    $vgpr0 = SI_SPILL_V32_RESTORE %stack.0, $sgpr0_sgpr1_sgpr2_sgpr3, $sgpr5, 0, implicit $exec :: (load 4 from %stack.0, addrspace 5)
+    S_BRANCH %bb.1
+
+  bb.1:
+    $vgpr0 = SI_SPILL_V32_RESTORE %stack.0, $sgpr0_sgpr1_sgpr2_sgpr3, $sgpr5, 0, implicit $exec :: (load 4 from %stack.0, addrspace 5)
+    S_ENDPGM 0, implicit $vgpr0
+...
Index: lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIRegisterInfo.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIRegisterInfo.cpp
+++ lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIRegisterInfo.cpp
@@ -584,7 +584,7 @@
     // We don't have access to the register scavenger if this function is called
     // during  PEI::scavengeFrameVirtualRegs().
     if (RS)
-      SOffset = RS->FindUnusedReg(&AMDGPU::SGPR_32RegClass);
+      SOffset = RS->scavengeRegister(&AMDGPU::SGPR_32RegClass, MI, 0, false);
 
     if (SOffset == AMDGPU::NoRegister) {
       // There are no free SGPRs, and since we are in the process of spilling


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D59844.192353.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2595 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20190326/aadcb395/attachment.bin>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list