[PATCH] D59450: [ValueTracking] Use ConstantRange overflow check for signed add (NFC)

Nikita Popov via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Mar 17 14:32:34 PDT 2019


nikic marked an inline comment as done.
nikic added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp:4132
+      mapOverflowResult(LHSRange.signedAddMayOverflow(RHSRange));
+  if (OR != OverflowResult::MayOverflow)
+    return OR;
----------------
lebedev.ri wrote:
> I'm guessing `OverflowResult` won't grow, so there is no danger of accidentally doing the wrong thing here.
I do want to grow it a bit... I'd like to split up the AlwaysOverflows case into AlwaysOverflowsLow and AlwaysOverflowsHigh, so that it can be used in saturating math optimization. But that shouldn't have any impact on this check :)


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D59450/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D59450





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list