[PATCH] D59029: [libc++] Do not specify the underlying type of memory_order

[Louis Dionne via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

ldionne added a comment.

I'm going to add a test. I'm not sure whether we should be checking that the underlying types are the same, or that they have the same size. Scoped and unscoped enumerations have different underlying types in GCC and Clang but I'm not 100% sure the difference is intended (it probably is). I've asked a question to CWG and I'll update this when I know for sure.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D59029/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D59029