[PATCH] D58400: [AMDGPU] Implement AMDGPUMCInstrAnalysis

[Matt Arsenault via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

arsenm added a comment.

In D58400#1405973 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D58400#1405973>, @scott.linder wrote:

> Does anyone have an opinion on returning negative branch targets (e.g. `<keep_symbol+0xfffffffffffe0018>`)? I don't know how this would ever come up in hardware anyway, or what the hardware would do, but it doesn't seem very helpful in the disassembly.


The hardware doesn't know about the symbol? Do you mean for overflow?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D58400/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D58400