[PATCH] D57601: Seperate volatility and atomicity/ordering in SelectionDAG

[Philip Reames via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

reames added a comment.

In D57601#1401075 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57601#1401075>, @asb wrote:

> It seems there's a clear plan on the path forwards - is it worth writing it up as a short RFC on the mailing list, particular given the potential for subtle issues for out-of-tree backends?


I was planning on sending a note after it lands.  Happy to do so now if folks things it's warranted.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D57601/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D57601