[PATCH] D58384: [ThinLTO] Fix test with reverse-iteration

[Mehdi AMINI via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

mehdi_amini added a comment.

Is it expected that the test output is sensitive to reverse iteration?
It sounds to me more like an issue with the code than with how the test is expressed.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D58384/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D58384