[PATCH] D58231: [LICM] Support of widenable condition guards in LICM

[Max Kazantsev via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

mkazantsev added a comment.

The main motivation is unification - I don't want to leave a single thing that is supported for intrinsic guards and not supported for control flow guards. Unswitching has known problems related to exponential code size growth, so I don't want our ability to eliminate guards in loops to depend on its cost model.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D58231/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D58231