[PATCH] D54438: [analyzer] Reimplement dependencies between checkers

[Mikael Holmén via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

uabelho added inline comments.


================
Comment at: cfe/trunk/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/Checkers.td:230
 
 def NullReturnedFromNonnullChecker : Checker<"NullReturnedFromNonnull">,
   HelpText<"Warns when a null pointer is returned from a function that has "
----------------
Szelethus wrote:
> uabelho wrote:
> > Any reason this checker shouldn't get a dependecy too?
> > 
> > If I run it with
> > 
> >  clang -cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core -analyzer-checker=nullability.NullReturnedFromNonnull empty.c
> > 
> > on an empty file empty.c I get
> > 
> > clang: ../tools/clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/CheckerManager.h:171: CHECKER *clang::ento::CheckerManager::getChecker() [CHECKER = (anonymous namespace)::NullabilityChecker]: Assertion `CheckerTags.count(tag) != 0 && "Requested checker is not registered! Maybe you should add it as a " "dependency in Checkers.td?"' failed.
> > 
> > If I add
> >  Dependencies<[NullabilityBase]>,
> > to it, then it doesn't trigger the assert.
> > 
> > I don't know anything about this code, what do you think about it?
> Yup, should be there. Thanks for catching this one! I'll be able to commit the fix in about 4ish hours, or if it blocks you, feel free to so before that.
> 
> Since I didnt add test for each and every affected checker, I wonder whether there is any more of these that I forgot/messed up while rebasing.
> 
> Thanks again! :)
Sounds good, no panic!

Thanks!


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D54438/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D54438