[llvm] r352289 - [X86] combineCarryThroughADD - add support for X86::COND_A commutations (PR24545)
Simon Pilgrim via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Jan 26 12:23:04 PST 2019
Author: rksimon
Date: Sat Jan 26 12:23:04 2019
New Revision: 352289
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=352289&view=rev
Log:
[X86] combineCarryThroughADD - add support for X86::COND_A commutations (PR24545)
As discussed on PR24545, we should try to commute X86::COND_A 'icmp ugt' cases to X86::COND_B 'icmp ult' to more optimally bind the carry flag output to a SBB instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57281
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/combine-sbb.ll
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp?rev=352289&r1=352288&r2=352289&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp Sat Jan 26 12:23:04 2019
@@ -34876,7 +34876,7 @@ static bool checkBoolTestAndOrSetCCCombi
// When legalizing carry, we create carries via add X, -1
// If that comes from an actual carry, via setcc, we use the
// carry directly.
-static SDValue combineCarryThroughADD(SDValue EFLAGS) {
+static SDValue combineCarryThroughADD(SDValue EFLAGS, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
if (EFLAGS.getOpcode() == X86ISD::ADD) {
if (isAllOnesConstant(EFLAGS.getOperand(1))) {
SDValue Carry = EFLAGS.getOperand(0);
@@ -34889,8 +34889,27 @@ static SDValue combineCarryThroughADD(SD
Carry = Carry.getOperand(0);
if (Carry.getOpcode() == X86ISD::SETCC ||
Carry.getOpcode() == X86ISD::SETCC_CARRY) {
- if (Carry.getConstantOperandVal(0) == X86::COND_B)
- return Carry.getOperand(1);
+ // TODO: Merge this code with equivalent in combineAddOrSubToADCOrSBB?
+ uint64_t CarryCC = Carry.getConstantOperandVal(0);
+ SDValue CarryOp1 = Carry.getOperand(1);
+ if (CarryCC == X86::COND_B)
+ return CarryOp1;
+ if (CarryCC == X86::COND_A) {
+ // Try to convert COND_A into COND_B in an attempt to facilitate
+ // materializing "setb reg".
+ //
+ // Do not flip "e > c", where "c" is a constant, because Cmp
+ // instruction cannot take an immediate as its first operand.
+ //
+ if (CarryOp1.getOpcode() == X86ISD::SUB && CarryOp1.hasOneUse() &&
+ CarryOp1.getValueType().isInteger() &&
+ !isa<ConstantSDNode>(CarryOp1.getOperand(1))) {
+ SDValue SubCommute =
+ DAG.getNode(X86ISD::SUB, SDLoc(CarryOp1), CarryOp1->getVTList(),
+ CarryOp1.getOperand(1), CarryOp1.getOperand(0));
+ return SDValue(SubCommute.getNode(), CarryOp1.getResNo());
+ }
+ }
}
}
}
@@ -34905,7 +34924,7 @@ static SDValue combineSetCCEFLAGS(SDValu
SelectionDAG &DAG,
const X86Subtarget &Subtarget) {
if (CC == X86::COND_B)
- if (SDValue Flags = combineCarryThroughADD(EFLAGS))
+ if (SDValue Flags = combineCarryThroughADD(EFLAGS, DAG))
return Flags;
if (SDValue R = checkBoolTestSetCCCombine(EFLAGS, CC))
@@ -40558,7 +40577,7 @@ static SDValue combineX86AddSub(SDNode *
}
static SDValue combineSBB(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
- if (SDValue Flags = combineCarryThroughADD(N->getOperand(2))) {
+ if (SDValue Flags = combineCarryThroughADD(N->getOperand(2), DAG)) {
MVT VT = N->getSimpleValueType(0);
SDVTList VTs = DAG.getVTList(VT, MVT::i32);
return DAG.getNode(X86ISD::SBB, SDLoc(N), VTs,
@@ -40601,7 +40620,7 @@ static SDValue combineADC(SDNode *N, Sel
return DCI.CombineTo(N, Res1, CarryOut);
}
- if (SDValue Flags = combineCarryThroughADD(N->getOperand(2))) {
+ if (SDValue Flags = combineCarryThroughADD(N->getOperand(2), DAG)) {
MVT VT = N->getSimpleValueType(0);
SDVTList VTs = DAG.getVTList(VT, MVT::i32);
return DAG.getNode(X86ISD::ADC, SDLoc(N), VTs,
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/combine-sbb.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/combine-sbb.ll?rev=352289&r1=352288&r2=352289&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/combine-sbb.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/combine-sbb.ll Sat Jan 26 12:23:04 2019
@@ -126,19 +126,15 @@ define i8 @PR24545(i32, i32, i32* nocapt
; X86: # %bb.0:
; X86-NEXT: movl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %eax
; X86-NEXT: movl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %ecx
-; X86-NEXT: movl (%ecx), %edx
-; X86-NEXT: cmpl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %edx
-; X86-NEXT: seta %dl
-; X86-NEXT: addb $-1, %dl
+; X86-NEXT: movl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %edx
+; X86-NEXT: cmpl (%ecx), %edx
; X86-NEXT: sbbl 4(%ecx), %eax
; X86-NEXT: setb %al
; X86-NEXT: retl
;
; X64-LABEL: PR24545:
; X64: # %bb.0:
-; X64-NEXT: cmpl %edi, (%rdx)
-; X64-NEXT: seta %al
-; X64-NEXT: addb $-1, %al
+; X64-NEXT: cmpl (%rdx), %edi
; X64-NEXT: sbbl 4(%rdx), %esi
; X64-NEXT: setb %al
; X64-NEXT: retq
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list