[llvm] r351950 - [AMDGPU] With XNACK, cannot clause a load with result coalesced with operand
Tim Renouf via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jan 23 05:38:06 PST 2019
Author: tpr
Date: Wed Jan 23 05:38:06 2019
New Revision: 351950
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=351950&view=rev
Log:
[AMDGPU] With XNACK, cannot clause a load with result coalesced with operand
Summary:
With XNACK, an smem load whose result is coalesced with an operand (thus
it overwrites its own operand) cannot appear in a clause, because some
other instruction might XNACK and restart the whole clause.
The clause breaker already realized that an smem that overwrites an
operand cannot appear in a clause, and broke the clause. The problem
that this commit fixes is that the SIFormMemoryClauses optimization
formed a bundle with early clobber, which caused the earlier code that
set up the coalesced operand to be removed as dead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57008
Change-Id: I703c4d5b0bf7d6060222bec491f45c18bb3c0016
Added:
llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/smem-no-clause-coalesced.mir
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFormMemoryClauses.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFormMemoryClauses.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFormMemoryClauses.cpp?rev=351950&r1=351949&r2=351950&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFormMemoryClauses.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFormMemoryClauses.cpp Wed Jan 23 05:38:06 2019
@@ -118,6 +118,17 @@ static bool isValidClauseInst(const Mach
return false;
if (!IsVMEMClause && !isSMEMClauseInst(MI))
return false;
+ // If this is a load instruction where the result has been coalesced with an operand, then we cannot clause it.
+ for (const MachineOperand &ResMO : MI.defs()) {
+ unsigned ResReg = ResMO.getReg();
+ for (const MachineOperand &MO : MI.uses()) {
+ if (!MO.isReg() || MO.isDef())
+ continue;
+ if (MO.getReg() == ResReg)
+ return false;
+ }
+ break; // Only check the first def.
+ }
return true;
}
Added: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/smem-no-clause-coalesced.mir
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/smem-no-clause-coalesced.mir?rev=351950&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/smem-no-clause-coalesced.mir (added)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/smem-no-clause-coalesced.mir Wed Jan 23 05:38:06 2019
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+# RUN: llc -march=amdgcn -mcpu=gfx902 -o - %s -run-pass si-form-memory-clauses -verify-machineinstrs | FileCheck -check-prefix=XNACK %s
+
+# The SIFormMemoryClauses pass must not form a clause (indicated by BUNDLE)
+# from the two adjacent smem instructions, because the first one has its
+# result coalesced with an operand.
+
+# XNACK-LABEL: body:
+# XNACK-NOT: BUNDLE
+
+---
+name: _amdgpu_cs_main
+alignment: 0
+exposesReturnsTwice: false
+legalized: false
+regBankSelected: false
+selected: false
+failedISel: false
+tracksRegLiveness: true
+hasWinCFI: false
+fixedStack: []
+stack: []
+constants: []
+body: |
+ bb.0:
+ liveins: $sgpr2, $sgpr3, $sgpr12, $sgpr13, $sgpr14, $vgpr0, $vgpr1
+
+ %0:vgpr_32 = COPY $vgpr1
+ %1:sgpr_32 = COPY $sgpr12
+ %2:sgpr_32 = COPY $sgpr3
+ undef %3.sub0:sgpr_128 = COPY $sgpr2
+ %4:vgpr_32 = COPY $vgpr0
+ %5:sgpr_32 = COPY $sgpr14
+ %6:sgpr_32 = COPY $sgpr13
+ %7:sreg_64_xexec = S_GETPC_B64
+ %7.sub0:sreg_64_xexec = COPY %1
+ %3.sub1:sgpr_128 = S_AND_B32 %2, 65535, implicit-def dead $scc
+ %3.sub3:sgpr_128 = S_MOV_B32 151468
+ %3.sub2:sgpr_128 = S_MOV_B32 -1
+ %7.sub0:sreg_64_xexec = S_LOAD_DWORD_IMM %7, 48, 0 :: (load 4 from `i8 addrspace(4)* undef`, addrspace 4)
+ %8:sreg_64_xexec = S_BUFFER_LOAD_DWORDX2_IMM %3, 640, 0 :: (dereferenceable invariant load 8)
+ undef %9.sub0:vreg_128 = V_LSHL_ADD_U32 %6, 4, %4, implicit $exec
+ %9.sub1:vreg_128 = V_LSHL_ADD_U32 %5, 4, %0, implicit $exec
+ S_ENDPGM
+
+...
+
+
+
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list