[PATCH] D56819: Document toolchain update policy

[JF Bastien via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

jfb marked 2 inline comments as done.
jfb added inline comments.


================
Comment at: docs/DeveloperPolicy.rst:660
+      versions, etc).
+    - Detail downsides on important platforms (e.g. Ubuntu LTS status).
+
----------------
lebedev.ri wrote:
> Passing-by remark: it may be a good idea to consider debian stable too.
I don't want a list here because over time what matters will likely change. "e.g." is just an example. I expect us to be smart about this and not need everything spelled out in details.

In the follow-up RFC I'll send next week, I plan to use the same table of *nix distros that I had in my BoF: RHEL, Debian, OpenBSD, Ubuntu (as well as GCC, LLVM, and MSVC mentions). I'd expect future RFCs to use a similar list, adding / removing as appropriate.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D56819/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D56819