[PATCH] D56551: [LoopVectorizer] give more advice in remark about failure to vectorize call

Ayal Zaks via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jan 11 10:20:10 PST 2019


Ayal added a comment.

This LGTM too, just adding mtcw wondering if these extra checks for more accurate reporting are worth placing under allowExtraAnalysis(); and/or if TLI->isFunctionVectorizable() shouldn't be the one informing the cause of its failure when returning false.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D56551/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D56551





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list