[PATCH] D56551: [LoopVectorizer] give more advice in remark about failure to vectorize call
Ayal Zaks via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jan 11 10:20:10 PST 2019
Ayal added a comment.
This LGTM too, just adding mtcw wondering if these extra checks for more accurate reporting are worth placing under allowExtraAnalysis(); and/or if TLI->isFunctionVectorizable() shouldn't be the one informing the cause of its failure when returning false.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56551/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56551
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list