[llvm] r350220 - [BasicAA] Support arbitrary pointer sizes (and fix an overflow bug)
Hal Finkel via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jan 2 08:28:10 PST 2019
Author: hfinkel
Date: Wed Jan 2 08:28:09 2019
New Revision: 350220
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=350220&view=rev
Log:
[BasicAA] Support arbitrary pointer sizes (and fix an overflow bug)
Motivated by the discussion in D38499, this patch updates BasicAA to support
arbitrary pointer sizes by switching most remaining non-APInt calculations to
use APInt. The size of these APInts is set to the maximum pointer size (maximum
over all address spaces described by the data layout string).
Most of this translation is straightforward, but this patch contains a fix for
a bug that revealed itself during this translation process. In order for
test/Analysis/BasicAA/gep-and-alias.ll to pass, which is run with 32-bit
pointers, the intermediate calculations must be performed using 64-bit
integers. This is because, as noted in the patch, when GetLinearExpression
decomposes an expression into C1*V+C2, and we then multiply this by Scale, and
distribute, to get (C1*Scale)*V + C2*Scale, it can be the case that, even
through C1*V+C2 does not overflow for relevant values of V, (C2*Scale) can
overflow. If this happens, later logic will draw invalid conclusions from the
(base) offset value. Thus, when initially applying the APInt conversion,
because the maximum pointer size in this test is 32 bits, it started failing.
Suspicious, I created a 64-bit version of this test (included here), and that
failed (miscompiled) on trunk for a similar reason (the multiplication can
overflow).
After fixing this overflow bug, the first test case (at least) in
Analysis/BasicAA/q.bad.ll started failing. This is also a 32-bit test, and was
relying on having 64-bit intermediate values to have BasicAA return an accurate
result. In order to fix this problem, and because I believe that it is not
uncommon to use i64 indexing expressions in 32-bit code (especially portable
code using int64_t), it seems reasonable to always use at least 64-bit
integers. In this way, we won't regress our analysis capabilities (and there's
a command-line option added, so experimenting with this should be easy).
As pointed out by Eli during the review, there are other potential overflow
conditions that this patch does not address. Fixing those is left to follow-up
work.
Patch by me with contributions from Michael Ferguson (mferguson at cray.com).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38662
Added:
llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BasicAA/128-bit-ptr.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BasicAA/gep-and-alias-64.ll
Modified:
llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.h
llvm/trunk/include/llvm/IR/DataLayout.h
llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp
llvm/trunk/lib/IR/DataLayout.cpp
llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BasicAA/gep-and-alias.ll
Modified: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.h
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.h?rev=350220&r1=350219&r2=350220&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.h (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.h Wed Jan 2 08:28:09 2019
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ private:
unsigned ZExtBits;
unsigned SExtBits;
- int64_t Scale;
+ APInt Scale;
bool operator==(const VariableGEPIndex &Other) const {
return V == Other.V && ZExtBits == Other.ZExtBits &&
@@ -133,10 +133,10 @@ private:
// Base pointer of the GEP
const Value *Base;
// Total constant offset w.r.t the base from indexing into structs
- int64_t StructOffset;
+ APInt StructOffset;
// Total constant offset w.r.t the base from indexing through
// pointers/arrays/vectors
- int64_t OtherOffset;
+ APInt OtherOffset;
// Scaled variable (non-constant) indices.
SmallVector<VariableGEPIndex, 4> VarIndices;
};
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ private:
bool
constantOffsetHeuristic(const SmallVectorImpl<VariableGEPIndex> &VarIndices,
LocationSize V1Size, LocationSize V2Size,
- int64_t BaseOffset, AssumptionCache *AC,
+ APInt BaseOffset, AssumptionCache *AC,
DominatorTree *DT);
bool isValueEqualInPotentialCycles(const Value *V1, const Value *V2);
Modified: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/IR/DataLayout.h
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/IR/DataLayout.h?rev=350220&r1=350219&r2=350220&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/IR/DataLayout.h (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/IR/DataLayout.h Wed Jan 2 08:28:09 2019
@@ -334,6 +334,9 @@ public:
/// the backends/clients are updated.
unsigned getPointerSize(unsigned AS = 0) const;
+ /// Returns the maximum pointer size over all address spaces.
+ unsigned getMaxPointerSize() const;
+
// Index size used for address calculation.
unsigned getIndexSize(unsigned AS) const;
@@ -361,6 +364,11 @@ public:
return getPointerSize(AS) * 8;
}
+ /// Returns the maximum pointer size over all address spaces.
+ unsigned getMaxPointerSizeInBits() const {
+ return getMaxPointerSize() * 8;
+ }
+
/// Size in bits of index used for address calculation in getelementptr.
unsigned getIndexSizeInBits(unsigned AS) const {
return getIndexSize(AS) * 8;
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp?rev=350220&r1=350219&r2=350220&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp Wed Jan 2 08:28:09 2019
@@ -68,6 +68,16 @@ using namespace llvm;
/// Enable analysis of recursive PHI nodes.
static cl::opt<bool> EnableRecPhiAnalysis("basicaa-recphi", cl::Hidden,
cl::init(false));
+
+/// By default, even on 32-bit architectures we use 64-bit integers for
+/// calculations. This will allow us to more-aggressively decompose indexing
+/// expressions calculated using i64 values (e.g., long long in C) which is
+/// common enough to worry about.
+static cl::opt<bool> ForceAtLeast64Bits("basicaa-force-at-least-64b",
+ cl::Hidden, cl::init(true));
+static cl::opt<bool> DoubleCalcBits("basicaa-double-calc-bits",
+ cl::Hidden, cl::init(false));
+
/// SearchLimitReached / SearchTimes shows how often the limit of
/// to decompose GEPs is reached. It will affect the precision
/// of basic alias analysis.
@@ -381,13 +391,22 @@ static bool isObjectSize(const Value *V,
}
/// To ensure a pointer offset fits in an integer of size PointerSize
-/// (in bits) when that size is smaller than 64. This is an issue in
-/// particular for 32b programs with negative indices that rely on two's
-/// complement wrap-arounds for precise alias information.
-static int64_t adjustToPointerSize(int64_t Offset, unsigned PointerSize) {
- assert(PointerSize <= 64 && "Invalid PointerSize!");
- unsigned ShiftBits = 64 - PointerSize;
- return (int64_t)((uint64_t)Offset << ShiftBits) >> ShiftBits;
+/// (in bits) when that size is smaller than the maximum pointer size. This is
+/// an issue, for example, in particular for 32b pointers with negative indices
+/// that rely on two's complement wrap-arounds for precise alias information
+/// where the maximum pointer size is 64b.
+static APInt adjustToPointerSize(APInt Offset, unsigned PointerSize) {
+ assert(PointerSize <= Offset.getBitWidth() && "Invalid PointerSize!");
+ unsigned ShiftBits = Offset.getBitWidth() - PointerSize;
+ return (Offset << ShiftBits).ashr(ShiftBits);
+}
+
+static unsigned getMaxPointerSize(const DataLayout &DL) {
+ unsigned MaxPointerSize = DL.getMaxPointerSizeInBits();
+ if (MaxPointerSize < 64 && ForceAtLeast64Bits) MaxPointerSize = 64;
+ if (DoubleCalcBits) MaxPointerSize *= 2;
+
+ return MaxPointerSize;
}
/// If V is a symbolic pointer expression, decompose it into a base pointer
@@ -410,8 +429,7 @@ bool BasicAAResult::DecomposeGEPExpressi
unsigned MaxLookup = MaxLookupSearchDepth;
SearchTimes++;
- Decomposed.StructOffset = 0;
- Decomposed.OtherOffset = 0;
+ unsigned MaxPointerSize = getMaxPointerSize(DL);
Decomposed.VarIndices.clear();
do {
// See if this is a bitcast or GEP.
@@ -501,13 +519,15 @@ bool BasicAAResult::DecomposeGEPExpressi
if (CIdx->isZero())
continue;
Decomposed.OtherOffset +=
- DL.getTypeAllocSize(GTI.getIndexedType()) * CIdx->getSExtValue();
+ (DL.getTypeAllocSize(GTI.getIndexedType()) *
+ CIdx->getValue().sextOrSelf(MaxPointerSize))
+ .sextOrTrunc(MaxPointerSize);
continue;
}
GepHasConstantOffset = false;
- uint64_t Scale = DL.getTypeAllocSize(GTI.getIndexedType());
+ APInt Scale(MaxPointerSize, DL.getTypeAllocSize(GTI.getIndexedType()));
unsigned ZExtBits = 0, SExtBits = 0;
// If the integer type is smaller than the pointer size, it is implicitly
@@ -519,20 +539,34 @@ bool BasicAAResult::DecomposeGEPExpressi
// Use GetLinearExpression to decompose the index into a C1*V+C2 form.
APInt IndexScale(Width, 0), IndexOffset(Width, 0);
bool NSW = true, NUW = true;
+ const Value *OrigIndex = Index;
Index = GetLinearExpression(Index, IndexScale, IndexOffset, ZExtBits,
SExtBits, DL, 0, AC, DT, NSW, NUW);
- // All GEP math happens in the width of the pointer type,
- // so we can truncate the value to 64-bits as we don't handle
- // currently pointers larger than 64 bits and we would crash
- // later. TODO: Make `Scale` an APInt to avoid this problem.
- if (IndexScale.getBitWidth() > 64)
- IndexScale = IndexScale.sextOrTrunc(64);
-
// The GEP index scale ("Scale") scales C1*V+C2, yielding (C1*V+C2)*Scale.
// This gives us an aggregate computation of (C1*Scale)*V + C2*Scale.
- Decomposed.OtherOffset += IndexOffset.getSExtValue() * Scale;
- Scale *= IndexScale.getSExtValue();
+
+ // It can be the case that, even through C1*V+C2 does not overflow for
+ // relevant values of V, (C2*Scale) can overflow. In that case, we cannot
+ // decompose the expression in this way.
+ //
+ // FIXME: C1*Scale and the other operations in the decomposed
+ // (C1*Scale)*V+C2*Scale can also overflow. We should check for this
+ // possibility.
+ APInt WideScaledOffset = IndexOffset.sextOrTrunc(MaxPointerSize*2) *
+ Scale.sext(MaxPointerSize*2);
+ if (WideScaledOffset.getMinSignedBits() > MaxPointerSize) {
+ Index = OrigIndex;
+ IndexScale = 1;
+ IndexOffset = 0;
+
+ ZExtBits = SExtBits = 0;
+ if (PointerSize > Width)
+ SExtBits += PointerSize - Width;
+ } else {
+ Decomposed.OtherOffset += IndexOffset.sextOrTrunc(MaxPointerSize) * Scale;
+ Scale *= IndexScale.sextOrTrunc(MaxPointerSize);
+ }
// If we already had an occurrence of this index variable, merge this
// scale into it. For example, we want to handle:
@@ -552,9 +586,8 @@ bool BasicAAResult::DecomposeGEPExpressi
// pointer size.
Scale = adjustToPointerSize(Scale, PointerSize);
- if (Scale) {
- VariableGEPIndex Entry = {Index, ZExtBits, SExtBits,
- static_cast<int64_t>(Scale)};
+ if (!!Scale) {
+ VariableGEPIndex Entry = {Index, ZExtBits, SExtBits, Scale};
Decomposed.VarIndices.push_back(Entry);
}
}
@@ -1039,8 +1072,12 @@ static AliasResult aliasSameBasePointerG
// If the last (struct) indices are constants and are equal, the other indices
// might be also be dynamically equal, so the GEPs can alias.
- if (C1 && C2 && C1->getSExtValue() == C2->getSExtValue())
- return MayAlias;
+ if (C1 && C2) {
+ unsigned BitWidth = std::max(C1->getBitWidth(), C2->getBitWidth());
+ if (C1->getValue().sextOrSelf(BitWidth) ==
+ C2->getValue().sextOrSelf(BitWidth))
+ return MayAlias;
+ }
// Find the last-indexed type of the GEP, i.e., the type you'd get if
// you stripped the last index.
@@ -1123,6 +1160,10 @@ static AliasResult aliasSameBasePointerG
return MayAlias;
}
+ if (C1->getValue().getActiveBits() > 64 ||
+ C2->getValue().getActiveBits() > 64)
+ return MayAlias;
+
// We know that:
// - both GEPs begin indexing from the exact same pointer;
// - the last indices in both GEPs are constants, indexing into a struct;
@@ -1203,8 +1244,8 @@ bool BasicAAResult::isGEPBaseAtNegativeO
!DecompObject.VarIndices.empty())
return false;
- int64_t ObjectBaseOffset = DecompObject.StructOffset +
- DecompObject.OtherOffset;
+ APInt ObjectBaseOffset = DecompObject.StructOffset +
+ DecompObject.OtherOffset;
// If the GEP has no variable indices, we know the precise offset
// from the base, then use it. If the GEP has variable indices,
@@ -1212,10 +1253,11 @@ bool BasicAAResult::isGEPBaseAtNegativeO
// false in that case.
if (!DecompGEP.VarIndices.empty())
return false;
- int64_t GEPBaseOffset = DecompGEP.StructOffset;
+
+ APInt GEPBaseOffset = DecompGEP.StructOffset;
GEPBaseOffset += DecompGEP.OtherOffset;
- return (GEPBaseOffset >= ObjectBaseOffset + (int64_t)ObjectAccessSize);
+ return GEPBaseOffset.sge(ObjectBaseOffset + (int64_t)ObjectAccessSize);
}
/// Provides a bunch of ad-hoc rules to disambiguate a GEP instruction against
@@ -1230,13 +1272,17 @@ BasicAAResult::aliasGEP(const GEPOperato
LocationSize V2Size, const AAMDNodes &V2AAInfo,
const Value *UnderlyingV1, const Value *UnderlyingV2) {
DecomposedGEP DecompGEP1, DecompGEP2;
+ unsigned MaxPointerSize = getMaxPointerSize(DL);
+ DecompGEP1.StructOffset = DecompGEP1.OtherOffset = APInt(MaxPointerSize, 0);
+ DecompGEP2.StructOffset = DecompGEP2.OtherOffset = APInt(MaxPointerSize, 0);
+
bool GEP1MaxLookupReached =
DecomposeGEPExpression(GEP1, DecompGEP1, DL, &AC, DT);
bool GEP2MaxLookupReached =
DecomposeGEPExpression(V2, DecompGEP2, DL, &AC, DT);
- int64_t GEP1BaseOffset = DecompGEP1.StructOffset + DecompGEP1.OtherOffset;
- int64_t GEP2BaseOffset = DecompGEP2.StructOffset + DecompGEP2.OtherOffset;
+ APInt GEP1BaseOffset = DecompGEP1.StructOffset + DecompGEP1.OtherOffset;
+ APInt GEP2BaseOffset = DecompGEP2.StructOffset + DecompGEP2.OtherOffset;
assert(DecompGEP1.Base == UnderlyingV1 && DecompGEP2.Base == UnderlyingV2 &&
"DecomposeGEPExpression returned a result different from "
@@ -1354,9 +1400,9 @@ BasicAAResult::aliasGEP(const GEPOperato
// that the objects are partially overlapping. If the difference is
// greater, we know they do not overlap.
if (GEP1BaseOffset != 0 && DecompGEP1.VarIndices.empty()) {
- if (GEP1BaseOffset >= 0) {
+ if (GEP1BaseOffset.sge(0)) {
if (V2Size != LocationSize::unknown()) {
- if ((uint64_t)GEP1BaseOffset < V2Size.getValue())
+ if (GEP1BaseOffset.ult(V2Size.getValue()))
return PartialAlias;
return NoAlias;
}
@@ -1371,7 +1417,7 @@ BasicAAResult::aliasGEP(const GEPOperato
// stripped a gep with negative index ('gep <ptr>, -1, ...).
if (V1Size != LocationSize::unknown() &&
V2Size != LocationSize::unknown()) {
- if (-(uint64_t)GEP1BaseOffset < V1Size.getValue())
+ if ((-GEP1BaseOffset).ult(V1Size.getValue()))
return PartialAlias;
return NoAlias;
}
@@ -1379,7 +1425,7 @@ BasicAAResult::aliasGEP(const GEPOperato
}
if (!DecompGEP1.VarIndices.empty()) {
- uint64_t Modulo = 0;
+ APInt Modulo(MaxPointerSize, 0);
bool AllPositive = true;
for (unsigned i = 0, e = DecompGEP1.VarIndices.size(); i != e; ++i) {
@@ -1387,7 +1433,7 @@ BasicAAResult::aliasGEP(const GEPOperato
// Grab the least significant bit set in any of the scales. We
// don't need std::abs here (even if the scale's negative) as we'll
// be ^'ing Modulo with itself later.
- Modulo |= (uint64_t)DecompGEP1.VarIndices[i].Scale;
+ Modulo |= DecompGEP1.VarIndices[i].Scale;
if (AllPositive) {
// If the Value could change between cycles, then any reasoning about
@@ -1408,9 +1454,9 @@ BasicAAResult::aliasGEP(const GEPOperato
// If the variable begins with a zero then we know it's
// positive, regardless of whether the value is signed or
// unsigned.
- int64_t Scale = DecompGEP1.VarIndices[i].Scale;
+ APInt Scale = DecompGEP1.VarIndices[i].Scale;
AllPositive =
- (SignKnownZero && Scale >= 0) || (SignKnownOne && Scale < 0);
+ (SignKnownZero && Scale.sge(0)) || (SignKnownOne && Scale.slt(0));
}
}
@@ -1419,18 +1465,18 @@ BasicAAResult::aliasGEP(const GEPOperato
// We can compute the difference between the two addresses
// mod Modulo. Check whether that difference guarantees that the
// two locations do not alias.
- uint64_t ModOffset = (uint64_t)GEP1BaseOffset & (Modulo - 1);
+ APInt ModOffset = GEP1BaseOffset & (Modulo - 1);
if (V1Size != LocationSize::unknown() &&
- V2Size != LocationSize::unknown() && ModOffset >= V2Size.getValue() &&
- V1Size.getValue() <= Modulo - ModOffset)
+ V2Size != LocationSize::unknown() && ModOffset.uge(V2Size.getValue()) &&
+ (Modulo - ModOffset).uge(V1Size.getValue()))
return NoAlias;
// If we know all the variables are positive, then GEP1 >= GEP1BasePtr.
// If GEP1BasePtr > V2 (GEP1BaseOffset > 0) then we know the pointers
// don't alias if V2Size can fit in the gap between V2 and GEP1BasePtr.
- if (AllPositive && GEP1BaseOffset > 0 &&
+ if (AllPositive && GEP1BaseOffset.sgt(0) &&
V2Size != LocationSize::unknown() &&
- V2Size.getValue() <= (uint64_t)GEP1BaseOffset)
+ GEP1BaseOffset.uge(V2Size.getValue()))
return NoAlias;
if (constantOffsetHeuristic(DecompGEP1.VarIndices, V1Size, V2Size,
@@ -1836,7 +1882,7 @@ void BasicAAResult::GetIndexDifference(
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Src.size(); i != e; ++i) {
const Value *V = Src[i].V;
unsigned ZExtBits = Src[i].ZExtBits, SExtBits = Src[i].SExtBits;
- int64_t Scale = Src[i].Scale;
+ APInt Scale = Src[i].Scale;
// Find V in Dest. This is N^2, but pointer indices almost never have more
// than a few variable indexes.
@@ -1856,7 +1902,7 @@ void BasicAAResult::GetIndexDifference(
}
// If we didn't consume this entry, add it to the end of the Dest list.
- if (Scale) {
+ if (!!Scale) {
VariableGEPIndex Entry = {V, ZExtBits, SExtBits, -Scale};
Dest.push_back(Entry);
}
@@ -1865,7 +1911,7 @@ void BasicAAResult::GetIndexDifference(
bool BasicAAResult::constantOffsetHeuristic(
const SmallVectorImpl<VariableGEPIndex> &VarIndices,
- LocationSize MaybeV1Size, LocationSize MaybeV2Size, int64_t BaseOffset,
+ LocationSize MaybeV1Size, LocationSize MaybeV2Size, APInt BaseOffset,
AssumptionCache *AC, DominatorTree *DT) {
if (VarIndices.size() != 2 || MaybeV1Size == LocationSize::unknown() ||
MaybeV2Size == LocationSize::unknown())
@@ -1910,14 +1956,15 @@ bool BasicAAResult::constantOffsetHeuris
// the minimum distance between %i and %i + 5 is 3.
APInt MinDiff = V0Offset - V1Offset, Wrapped = -MinDiff;
MinDiff = APIntOps::umin(MinDiff, Wrapped);
- uint64_t MinDiffBytes = MinDiff.getZExtValue() * std::abs(Var0.Scale);
+ APInt MinDiffBytes =
+ MinDiff.zextOrTrunc(Var0.Scale.getBitWidth()) * Var0.Scale.abs();
// We can't definitely say whether GEP1 is before or after V2 due to wrapping
// arithmetic (i.e. for some values of GEP1 and V2 GEP1 < V2, and for other
// values GEP1 > V2). We'll therefore only declare NoAlias if both V1Size and
// V2Size can fit in the MinDiffBytes gap.
- return V1Size + std::abs(BaseOffset) <= MinDiffBytes &&
- V2Size + std::abs(BaseOffset) <= MinDiffBytes;
+ return MinDiffBytes.uge(V1Size + BaseOffset.abs()) &&
+ MinDiffBytes.uge(V2Size + BaseOffset.abs());
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/IR/DataLayout.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/IR/DataLayout.cpp?rev=350220&r1=350219&r2=350220&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/IR/DataLayout.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/IR/DataLayout.cpp Wed Jan 2 08:28:09 2019
@@ -635,6 +635,14 @@ unsigned DataLayout::getPointerSize(unsi
return I->TypeByteWidth;
}
+unsigned DataLayout::getMaxPointerSize() const {
+ unsigned MaxPointerSize = 0;
+ for (auto &P : Pointers)
+ MaxPointerSize = std::max(MaxPointerSize, P.TypeByteWidth);
+
+ return MaxPointerSize;
+}
+
unsigned DataLayout::getPointerTypeSizeInBits(Type *Ty) const {
assert(Ty->isPtrOrPtrVectorTy() &&
"This should only be called with a pointer or pointer vector type");
Added: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BasicAA/128-bit-ptr.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BasicAA/128-bit-ptr.ll?rev=350220&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BasicAA/128-bit-ptr.ll (added)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BasicAA/128-bit-ptr.ll Wed Jan 2 08:28:09 2019
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+; This testcase consists of alias relations on 128-bit pointers that
+; should be completely resolvable by basicaa.
+
+; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -aa-eval -print-no-aliases -print-may-aliases -print-must-aliases -disable-output 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+
+target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-i128:128:128-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64-S128-p100:128:64:64-p101:128:64:64"
+
+
+; test0 is similar to SimpleCases.ll
+
+%T = type { i32, [10 x i8] }
+
+; CHECK: Function: test0
+; CHECK-NOT: MayAlias:
+define void @test0(%T addrspace(100)* %P) {
+ %A = getelementptr %T, %T addrspace(100)* %P, i64 0
+ %B = getelementptr %T, %T addrspace(100)* %P, i64 0, i32 0
+ %C = getelementptr %T, %T addrspace(100)* %P, i64 0, i32 1
+ %D = getelementptr %T, %T addrspace(100)* %P, i64 0, i32 1, i64 0
+ %E = getelementptr %T, %T addrspace(100)* %P, i64 0, i32 1, i64 5
+ ret void
+}
+
+; test1 checks that >64 bits of index can be considered.
+; If BasicAA is truncating the arithmetic, it will conclude
+; that %A and %B must alias when in fact they must not.
+
+; CHECK: Function: test1
+; CHECK-NOT: MustAlias:
+; CHECK: NoAlias:
+; CHECK-SAME: %A
+; CHECK-SAME: %B
+define void @test1(double addrspace(100)* %P, i128 %i) {
+ ; 1180591620717411303424 is 2**70
+ ; 590295810358705651712 is 2**69
+ %i70 = add i128 %i, 1180591620717411303424
+ %i69 = add i128 %i, 590295810358705651712
+ %A = getelementptr double, double addrspace(100)* %P, i128 %i70
+ %B = getelementptr double, double addrspace(100)* %P, i128 %i69
+ ret void
+}
+
+; test2 checks that >64 bits of index can be considered
+; and computes the same address in two ways to ensure that
+; they are considered equivalent.
+
+; CHECK: Function: test2
+; CHECK: MustAlias:
+; CHECK-SAME: %A
+; CHECK-SAME: %C
+define void @test2(double addrspace(100)* %P, i128 %i) {
+ ; 1180591620717411303424 is 2**70
+ ; 590295810358705651712 is 2**69
+ %i70 = add i128 %i, 1180591620717411303424
+ %i69 = add i128 %i, 590295810358705651712
+ %j70 = add i128 %i69, 590295810358705651712
+ %A = getelementptr double, double addrspace(100)* %P, i128 %i70
+ %C = getelementptr double, double addrspace(100)* %P, i128 %j70
+ ret void
+}
Added: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BasicAA/gep-and-alias-64.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BasicAA/gep-and-alias-64.ll?rev=350220&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BasicAA/gep-and-alias-64.ll (added)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BasicAA/gep-and-alias-64.ll Wed Jan 2 08:28:09 2019
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+; RUN: opt -S -basicaa -gvn < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+target datalayout = "e-m:o-p:64:64-f64:32:64-f80:128-n8:16:32-S128"
+target triple = "x86_64-apple-macosx10.6.0"
+
+; The load and store address in the loop body could alias so the load
+; can't be hoisted above the store and out of the loop.
+
+declare void @llvm.memset.p0i8.i64(i8* nocapture writeonly, i8, i64, i32, i1)
+
+define i64 @foo(i64 %x, i64 %z, i64 %n) {
+entry:
+ %pool = alloca [59 x i64], align 4
+ %tmp = bitcast [59 x i64]* %pool to i8*
+ call void @llvm.memset.p0i8.i64(i8* nonnull %tmp, i8 0, i64 236, i32 4, i1 false)
+ %cmp3 = icmp eq i64 %n, 0
+ br i1 %cmp3, label %for.end, label %for.body.lr.ph
+
+for.body.lr.ph: ; preds = %entry
+ %add = add i64 %z, %x
+ %and = and i64 %add, 9223372036854775807
+ %sub = add nsw i64 %and, -9223372036844814062
+ %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [59 x i64], [59 x i64]* %pool, i64 0, i64 %sub
+ %arrayidx1 = getelementptr inbounds [59 x i64], [59 x i64]* %pool, i64 0, i64 42
+ br label %for.body
+
+for.body: ; preds = %for.body.lr.ph, %for.body
+ %i.04 = phi i64 [ 0, %for.body.lr.ph ], [ %inc, %for.body ]
+ store i64 %i.04, i64* %arrayidx, align 4
+ %tmp1 = load i64, i64* %arrayidx1, align 4
+ %inc = add nuw i64 %i.04, 1
+ %exitcond = icmp ne i64 %inc, %n
+ br i1 %exitcond, label %for.body, label %for.end.loopexit
+
+for.end.loopexit: ; preds = %for.body
+ %lcssa = phi i64 [ %tmp1, %for.body ]
+ br label %for.end
+
+for.end: ; preds = %for.end.loopexit, %entry
+ %s = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %lcssa, %for.end.loopexit ]
+; CHECK: ret i64 %s
+ ret i64 %s
+}
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BasicAA/gep-and-alias.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BasicAA/gep-and-alias.ll?rev=350220&r1=350219&r2=350220&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BasicAA/gep-and-alias.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BasicAA/gep-and-alias.ll Wed Jan 2 08:28:09 2019
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
; RUN: opt -S -basicaa -gvn < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -S -basicaa -gvn -basicaa-force-at-least-64b=0 < %s | FileCheck %s
target datalayout = "e-m:o-p:32:32-f64:32:64-f80:128-n8:16:32-S128"
target triple = "i386-apple-macosx10.6.0"
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list