[llvm] r348997 - [test] Add a set of test for constant folding deopt operands with CVP

Philip Reames via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Dec 12 16:54:05 PST 2018


Author: reames
Date: Wed Dec 12 16:54:05 2018
New Revision: 348997

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=348997&view=rev
Log:
[test] Add a set of test for constant folding deopt operands with CVP

For anyone curious, the first test example is illustrative of a real code idiom produced by branching on the result of a three way comparison.


Added:
    llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CorrelatedValuePropagation/deopt.ll

Added: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CorrelatedValuePropagation/deopt.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CorrelatedValuePropagation/deopt.ll?rev=348997&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CorrelatedValuePropagation/deopt.ll (added)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CorrelatedValuePropagation/deopt.ll Wed Dec 12 16:54:05 2018
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
+; RUN: opt -correlated-propagation -S < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+declare void @use()
+; test requires a mix of context sensative refinement, and analysis
+; of the originating IR pattern.  Neither part is enough in isolation.
+define void @test1(i1 %c, i1 %c2) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test1(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SEL:%.*]] = select i1 [[C:%.*]], i64 -1, i64 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SEL2:%.*]] = select i1 [[C2:%.*]], i64 [[SEL]], i64 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp sgt i64 [[SEL2]], 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[CMP]], label [[TAKEN:%.*]], label [[UNTAKEN:%.*]]
+; CHECK:       taken:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @use() [ "deopt"(i64 [[SEL2]]) ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+; CHECK:       untaken:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+;
+  %sel = select i1 %c, i64 -1, i64 1
+  %sel2 = select i1 %c2, i64 %sel, i64 0
+  %cmp = icmp sgt i64 %sel2, 0
+  br i1 %cmp, label %taken, label %untaken
+taken:
+  call void @use() ["deopt" (i64 %sel2)]
+  ret void
+untaken:
+  ret void
+}
+
+declare void @llvm.assume(i1)
+declare void @llvm.experimental.guard(i1,...)
+
+; Same as test1, but with assume not branch
+define void @test1_assume(i1 %c, i1 %c2) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test1_assume(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SEL:%.*]] = select i1 [[C:%.*]], i64 -1, i64 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SEL2:%.*]] = select i1 [[C2:%.*]], i64 [[SEL]], i64 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp sgt i64 [[SEL2]], 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @llvm.assume(i1 [[CMP]])
+; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @use() [ "deopt"(i64 [[SEL2]]) ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+;
+  %sel = select i1 %c, i64 -1, i64 1
+  %sel2 = select i1 %c2, i64 %sel, i64 0
+  %cmp = icmp sgt i64 %sel2, 0
+  call void @llvm.assume(i1 %cmp)
+  call void @use() ["deopt" (i64 %sel2)]
+  ret void
+}
+
+; Same as test1, but with guard not branch
+define void @test1_guard(i1 %c, i1 %c2) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test1_guard(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SEL:%.*]] = select i1 [[C:%.*]], i64 -1, i64 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SEL2:%.*]] = select i1 [[C2:%.*]], i64 [[SEL]], i64 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp sgt i64 [[SEL2]], 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 [[CMP]]) [ "deopt"(i64 [[SEL2]]) ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @use() [ "deopt"(i64 [[SEL2]]) ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+;
+  %sel = select i1 %c, i64 -1, i64 1
+  %sel2 = select i1 %c2, i64 %sel, i64 0
+  %cmp = icmp sgt i64 %sel2, 0
+  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) ["deopt" (i64 %sel2)]
+  call void @use() ["deopt" (i64 %sel2)]
+  ret void
+}
+
+;; The rest of these are slight variations on the patterns
+;; producing 1 of several adjacent constants to test generality
+
+define void @test2(i1 %c, i1 %c2) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test2(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SEL:%.*]] = select i1 [[C:%.*]], i64 0, i64 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SEL2:%.*]] = select i1 [[C2:%.*]], i64 [[SEL]], i64 -1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp sgt i64 [[SEL2]], 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[CMP]], label [[TAKEN:%.*]], label [[UNTAKEN:%.*]]
+; CHECK:       taken:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @use() [ "deopt"(i64 [[SEL2]]) ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+; CHECK:       untaken:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+;
+  %sel = select i1 %c, i64 0, i64 1
+  %sel2 = select i1 %c2, i64 %sel, i64 -1
+  %cmp = icmp sgt i64 %sel2, 0
+  br i1 %cmp, label %taken, label %untaken
+taken:
+  call void @use() ["deopt" (i64 %sel2)]
+  ret void
+untaken:
+  ret void
+}
+define void @test3(i1 %c, i1 %c2) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test3(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SEL:%.*]] = select i1 [[C:%.*]], i64 0, i64 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SEL2:%.*]] = select i1 [[C2:%.*]], i64 [[SEL]], i64 2
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp sgt i64 [[SEL2]], 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[CMP]], label [[TAKEN:%.*]], label [[UNTAKEN:%.*]]
+; CHECK:       taken:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @use() [ "deopt"(i64 [[SEL2]]) ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+; CHECK:       untaken:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+;
+  %sel = select i1 %c, i64 0, i64 1
+  %sel2 = select i1 %c2, i64 %sel, i64 2
+  %cmp = icmp sgt i64 %sel2, 1
+  br i1 %cmp, label %taken, label %untaken
+taken:
+  call void @use() ["deopt" (i64 %sel2)]
+  ret void
+untaken:
+  ret void
+}
+
+define void @test4(i1 %c, i1 %c2) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test4(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SEL:%.*]] = select i1 [[C:%.*]], i64 0, i64 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SEL2:%.*]] = select i1 [[C2:%.*]], i64 0, i64 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[ADD1:%.*]] = add i64 0, [[SEL]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[ADD2:%.*]] = add i64 [[ADD1]], [[SEL2]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp sgt i64 [[ADD2]], 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[CMP]], label [[TAKEN:%.*]], label [[UNTAKEN:%.*]]
+; CHECK:       taken:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @use() [ "deopt"(i64 [[ADD2]]) ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+; CHECK:       untaken:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+;
+  %sel = select i1 %c, i64 0, i64 1
+  %sel2 = select i1 %c2, i64 0, i64 1
+  %add1 = add i64 0, %sel
+  %add2 = add i64 %add1, %sel2
+  %cmp = icmp sgt i64 %add2, 0
+  br i1 %cmp, label %taken, label %untaken
+taken:
+  call void @use() ["deopt" (i64 %add2)]
+  ret void
+untaken:
+  ret void
+}




More information about the llvm-commits mailing list