[PATCH] D55373: [LSR] Generate formulae to enable more post-incs
Gil Rapaport via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Dec 12 00:13:17 PST 2018
gilr added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp:3793
+
+ if (TTI.shouldFavorPostInc()) {
+ if (auto *GAddRec = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(G)) {
----------------
Is this relevant for non-Address kind formulae?
================
Comment at: lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp:3793
+
+ if (TTI.shouldFavorPostInc()) {
+ if (auto *GAddRec = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(G)) {
----------------
gilr wrote:
> Is this relevant for non-Address kind formulae?
Worth a comment here to describe the motivation and how adjusting the offset generates the post-inc opportunity.
================
Comment at: lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp:3795
+ if (auto *GAddRec = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(G)) {
+ if (auto *StepSCEV = GetConstantStart(GAddRec->getStepRecurrence(SE))) {
+ const APInt &StepInt = StepSCEV->getAPInt();
----------------
How does a non-constant step (e.g. 50 + %x) translate to post-inc? Could you add such a test case?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D55373/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D55373
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list