[PATCH] D55296: [Support] Fix GNU/kFreeBSD build
James Clarke via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Dec 4 14:16:45 PST 2018
jrtc27 marked 3 inline comments as done.
jrtc27 added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Support/Unix/Path.inc:59
#if !defined(__APPLE__) && !defined(__OpenBSD__) && !defined(__FreeBSD__) && \
- !defined(__linux__)
+ !defined(__linux__) && !defined(__FreeBSD_kernel__)
#include <sys/statvfs.h>
----------------
krytarowski wrote:
> jrtc27 wrote:
> > krytarowski wrote:
> > > efriedma wrote:
> > > > Does this make the `!defined(__FreeBSD__)` check redundant?
> > > Technically yes.
> > Unfortunately not. Plain FreeBSD just defines `__FreeBSD__`, and because that indicates both kernel and userland, `__FreeBSD_kernel__` was introduced just for GNU/kFreeBSD. In theory it should also be defined for pure FreeBSD, but it isn't. Maybe someone will propose that and we can drop this in 10 years' time, but today is not that day.
> FreeBSD defines it in `sys/param.h`.
>
> https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/blob/467e55b8abbf80cd144961ee51833b8ff4209b17/sys/sys/param.h#L65
Huh, TIL. I wonder why this isn't put in the compiler(s) though... Anyway, like it says, we should still really be checking for `__FreeBSD__`.
Repository:
rL LLVM
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D55296/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D55296
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list