[PATCH] D53184: [LangRef] Clarify semantics of volatile operations.

[Hal Finkel via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

hfinkel added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53184#1296581, @mkazantsev wrote:

> LGTM


I still think it would be better to explicitly say something about the access properties here relative to inaccessiblememonly functions. Also, are we saying that volatile loads can write to this inaccessible memory?


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D53184