[PATCH] D49103: Lower llvm.objectsize earlier in our optimization pipeline

[Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

dexonsmith added a reviewer: jfb.
dexonsmith added a comment.

This approach seems reasonable, but it would be great to have a chance to run some numbers internally to be sure we not losing something important.

You mentioned a 1.9% degradation with the current placement.  Did you happen to try any other locations in the pipeline?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D49103